Lomborg先生持有异议。
Lomborg pretends otherwise because he disagrees with the priorities they set.
隆伯格指鹿为马，只不过因为他反对别人订定的顺序。
Perhaps that explain why a new book by Bjorn Lomborg received so much publicity.
或许这解释了为啥通过比约恩·隆伯格新书收到这么多的宣传。
"We will never succeed in making dirty energy clean and inexpensive," Lomborg said.
“我们永远不能使‘脏’能源变得清洁而廉价。”恩隆伯格说。
Yet Lomborg is as guilty of exaggeration and selective use of data as those he criticizes.
然而鲁姆·伯克正像他所抨击的那些人一样，也存在夸大事实、有选择性地使用数据等问题。
When he returned to Denmark, Lomborg got in touch with local friends from the Skivehus club.
回到丹麦后，龙波格联络他在史基薇贺斯扶轮社的朋友。
Lomborg summarized these findings in How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place.
隆伯格在《如何花500亿使地球更美好》一书中总结了这些观点。
Mr. Lomborg writes: What one or two steps could be taken in 2011 to make progress in global climate change?
龙波先生写道：“2011年要想在全球气候变化问题上取得新的进展，可以采取什么措施呢？”
Mr Lomborg reckons that the benefits of implementing the Kyoto protocol would probably outweigh the costs, but not until 2100.
Lomborg先生估算，在2100年前，实施京都协议的收益会低于成本。
Some scientists say they initially hoped to ignore Lomborg but in the wake of his book's popularity have reacted with a fury rarely seen in academia.
一些科学家说起初他们不想理睬鲁姆伯克的言论，可是随着《持怀疑态度的环保主义者》一书的不断升温，他们愤怒回击，其愤怒程度在学术界实数罕见。
Professor Lomborg does not believe that reducing carbon emissions will solve the problem, and argues that our focus on emission reduction is misplaced.
隆伯格教授并不认为减少碳排放能够解决问题，并质疑我们孜孜不倦的关注减排是种错误。
When Lomborg restates the number of lost species as a percentage of total species, is he simply showing the true size of the problem or is he perhaps also trying to trivialize it?
隆伯格一再地以比例来谈灭绝物种的数量，他只是想说明问题的规模呢，或者是大事化小、小事化无的手法呢？
Lomborg, author of the book "Cool It: the Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming," believes the cap-and-trade approach favored by Flannery and others is doomed to failure.
隆姆博格，他是《降温：持怀疑论环境主义者的全球变暖指南》(CoolIt：The Skeptical Environmentalist ' s Guideto Global Warming)一书的作者，认定弗兰纳里和其他一些人青睐的总量管制与排放交易(cap - and - trade)方法是注定要失败的。
Especially, since Bjorn Lomborg, Denmark scholars, published the Skeptical Environmentalist, international academics on the evaluation of environmental problems have been entirely different.
特别自丹麦学者比昂·隆伯格出版《可疑的环保主义者》一书以来，国际学术界对环境问题的评价形成了泾渭分明的两派。
Especially, since Bjorn Lomborg, Denmark scholars, published the Skeptical Environmentalist, international academics on the evaluation of environmental problems have been entirely different.
特别自丹麦学者比昂·隆伯格出版《可疑的环保主义者》一书以来，国际学术界对环境问题的评价形成了泾渭分明的两派。
应用推荐