Anyways that's what inductive arguments rely on.
不管怎么样，这是归纳论点所依赖的。
There are deductive arguments and there are inductive arguments.
演绎论点和，归纳论点。
There are sub categories within the category of inductive arguments.
在归纳论点分类下面，有一些次分类。
All inductive arguments are actually a form of this of inductive generalization.
归纳论点实际上，是一种归纳推广的形式。
You mustn't think that deductive argument is certain and inductive arguments aren't.
你不能认为演绎论点是确定的，归纳论点是不确定的。
Decide which of those are deductive arguments and which of those are inductive arguments.
决定哪些是演绎论点，哪些是归纳论点。
Okay Inductive arguments are such that Prof. : good okay, I can hear that you have got it as well.
好，归纳论点是，教授：很好，我听见你们明白了。
All inductive arguments rely on the principle of the uniformity of nature as Hugh called it, David Hugh.
归纳论点依赖于，大卫，休谟所谓的自然的统一性准则。
Well inductive arguments are such that the truth of their premises makes the truth of their conclusion more or less likely.
归纳论点是这样的，前提的真理，使结论的真理更加可信或者不可信。
Okay different types of inductive arguments are inductive generalizations, causal generalizations, arguments from analogy, and arguments from authority.
好，不同类型的归纳论点，是归纳的推广，因果推广，类比论点，权威论点。
Okay so we have looked at inductive generalizations and causal generalizations, arguments from analogy, and arguments from authority or different types of inductive arguments.
好，我们看了归纳推广,和因果推广，类比论点，和权威论点,或者不同形式的归纳论点。
And the only arguments for the principle of the uniformity of nature itself are themselves inductive.
唯一的论点，对于自然统一性准则本身来说，他们本身就是归纳的。
So those were the tests for an inductive generalization, these were the test for causal generalization, these for the arguments from analogy, and these for argument from authority.
那些是对归纳推广的测验，这些是对因果推广的测验，这些是类比论点的测验，这些是权威论点的测验。
An inductive argument is more or less strong whereas deductive arguments are either valid or invalid. Okay What does an argument have to have in order it to be sound?
归纳论点或多或少有力，但是演绎论点有效无效，什么能说明论点完好？
An inductive argument is more or less strong whereas deductive arguments are either valid or invalid. Okay What does an argument have to have in order it to be sound?
归纳论点或多或少有力，但是演绎论点有效无效，什么能说明论点完好？
应用推荐