For example, the herbicide-resistant gene in GM RR soy was pieced together from a plant virus, two different soil bacteria, and a petunia plant.
举例说，抗草甘膦转基因大豆中的抗除草剂基因，由一种植物病毒、两种不同的土壤细菌，以及一种矮牵牛花植物的基因组合而成。
Many of the promised benefits to farmers of GM crops, including GM RR soy, have not materialized. On the other hand, unexpected problems have arisen.
包括抗草甘膦除草剂大豆在内的关于转基因作物对农民有益的许多允诺，并没有实现。另外以方面，出现了许多未预料的问题。
Manufacturers of glyphosate and proponents of GM RR soy claim that glyphosate breaks down rapidly into harmless substances and is not harmful to the environment.
草甘膦除草剂的制造商与抗草甘膦转基因大豆的拥护者们声称草甘膦能够迅速分解为无害的物质而且对环境无害。
Once the energy and fossil fuel used in herbicide production are taken into account, claims of environmental sustainability for GM RR soy with no-till systems collapse.
一旦将除草剂生产中消耗的化石燃料能源一并考虑，宣称抗草甘膦除草剂转基因大豆及其免耕系统有助于环境可持续性的理由立刻坍塌。
A possible explanation for the lower yields of GM RR soy is that the transgenic modification alters the plant's physiology so that it takes up nutrients less effectively.
对抗草甘膦除草剂大豆较低产量的可能的解释是，转基因改造改变了作物的生理学使它低效吸收养分。
It is often claimed that no-till with GM RR soy farming model saves energy because it reduces the number of times the producer must pass across the field with the tractor.
经常有人声称免耕种植抗草甘膦除草剂转基因大豆的耕作模型节能，因为它减少生产者开着拖拉机通过农田的次数。
Areas of study include the health and environmental effects of GM RR soy and the glyphosate herbicide that accompanies it, agronomic performance, and economic impacts to farmers and markets.
这些研究的领域，包括抗草甘膦“终结者”除草剂转基因大豆及其种植必须施用的草甘膦除草剂对健康与环境的影响，其农艺学表现，以及对农民与市场的经济影响。
The findings show that GM RR soy is not substantially equivalent to non-GM soy, but differs in its properties, effects on experimental animals, environmental impacts, and in-field performance.
这些研究发现，抗草甘膦转基因大豆与非转基因大豆不是“实质相同”，而是在它们的性质上、对于实验动物的作用上、在环境影响上，以及农田种植实际表现方面有区别。
The findings show that GM RR soy is not substantially equivalent to non-GM soy, but differs in its properties, effects on experimental animals, environmental impacts, and in-field performance.
这些研究发现，抗草甘膦转基因大豆与非转基因大豆不是“实质相同”，而是在它们的性质上、对于实验动物的作用上、在环境影响上，以及农田种植实际表现方面有区别。
应用推荐