For the Apple site's aesthetics, Fadeyev remarks that.
关于苹果网站的美观度，Fade yev认为。
Fadeyev considers Microsoft's site "pretty good, but pretty good just isn't enough."
Fade yev认为微软的网站“也很不错，但仅仅不错还是远远不够的。”
Fadeyev USES 7 criteria to compare the web sites of the two major players in software industry, Apple and Microsoft.
Fadeyev通过7项标准对软件业的两位老大：苹果与微软的网站进行了评测。
Overall, Fadeyev considers Apple's web site as a winner, while Microsoft suffers mostly because of lack of consistency.
在这场比拼中，Fade yev认为苹果最终获胜，而微软失败的重要原因在于一致性的缺乏。
Fadeyev considers Apple's website as very readable, using larger fonts for titles and lots of white space to separate content.
Fade yev认为苹果网站的可读性非常棒，标题使用了更大的字体而且还用空白将内容分隔开。
Microsoft's search feature always prints results in a page, there are lots of results, which Fadeyev considers proper for their web site.
微软的搜索则不然，它总是在新的页面上显示众多的查询结果，Fadeyev认为这么做比较适合微软的网站。
Fadeyev considers the drop-down menus as good but they cover the content below if activated accidentally with the mouse and the reader needs to move the mouse off the area to close them.
Fadeyev虽然也觉得下拉菜单 挺不错，但如果不小心被鼠标碰到了，菜单就会将下面的内容遮起来，用户还得将鼠标移开才能关闭菜单。
Fadeyev considers the drop-down menus as good but they cover the content below if activated accidentally with the mouse and the reader needs to move the mouse off the area to close them.
Fadeyev虽然也觉得下拉菜单 挺不错，但如果不小心被鼠标碰到了，菜单就会将下面的内容遮起来，用户还得将鼠标移开才能关闭菜单。
应用推荐