Part II: Analysis of the major environmental public interest litigation theories.
第二部分：主要分析了环境公益诉讼制度的理论基础。
Finally, the environmental public interest litigation system for Economic Analysis.
最后对环境公益诉讼制度进行了法经济学分析。
Then, emphasizing that nature can not become a plaintiff of the environmental public interest litigation.
其次，指出自然物不能成为环境公益诉讼的原告。
Part V: Construction of China's environmental public interest litigation system put forward some concrete ideas.
第五部分：对我国构建环境公益诉讼制度提出了一些具体构想。
Chapter 3 investigates the plaintiff qualification in environmental public interest litigation in United States, India and Japan.
第三章对美国、印度和日本的环境公益诉讼原告资格进行了考察。
This thesis consists of four chapters: chapter 1 introduces the general situation of environmental public interest litigation system.
除引言和结语外，本文共分为四章。第一章介绍了环境公益诉讼制度的概况。
The fourth chapter explains how to construct the standing of environmental public interest litigation, this is the key of this thesis.
第四章重点阐述如何构建我国环境公益诉讼原告资格制度，这是论文的核心。
The forth chapter analyses the actuality about country's environmental public interest litigation, and points out the existed defects.
第四章分析我国环境公益诉讼的现状并指出存在的缺陷。
Environmental public interest litigation system has been established in many countries, which protects and redresses environmental public interest.
世界很多国家已建立起相应的诉讼制度——环境行政公益诉讼制度，对环境公共利益予以保护和救济。
Expanding plaintiff qualification's type of environmental public interest litigation is to extend social protection of public environmental interests.
环境公益诉讼原告资格的类型拓展，是扩展社会主体环境公共利益保障空间的现实要求。
The environmental public interest litigation system should be constructed in the process of amending Administrative Litigation law and Environmental Law.
在《行政诉讼法》和《环境法》的修改中亟需确立环境公益行政诉讼制度。
Finally, the thesis harmonizes the multi-plaintiff conditions in order to make the best use of the standing of the environmental public interest litigation.
最后，对原告多元化的问题进行协调，以求环境公益诉讼原告资格扩展后作用最大化。
The last chapter is the most important chapter; it gives some advices for the China's construction of the system of environmental public interest litigation.
第五章是本文的重点章节，本章对我国构建环境公益诉讼制度提出一点浅薄的建议。
The environmental public interest litigation which we are supposed to establish refers to the litigation which only protect the environmental public interest.
我们要建立的环境公益诉讼仅指维护环境公共利益的诉讼。
Besides introduction and conclusion, this thesis is constituted of four parts. The first chapter introduces some basic definitions of environmental public interest litigation.
本文除引言和结论外，共分为四章：第一章阐述环境公益诉讼的基本概念。
The forth chapter analyses the actuality about country's environmental public interest litigation, and points out the existed defects. The last chapter is the most important chapter;
第四章分析我国环境公益诉讼的现状并指出存在的缺陷。
Environment is not an object of rights. And thus, both environmental right theory and public trust theory could not provide theoretical support for environmental public interest litigation.
环境不可能成为权利的对象，环境权论和公共信托理论都无法为环境公益诉讼提供理论支撑。
Based on that, this paper studies on the standing of environmental public interest litigation, hoping for it can be helpful to the establishment of environmental public interest litigation in China.
基于此，本文通过对环境公益诉讼适格原告的研究，希望对我国环境公益诉讼制度的建设有所帮助。
The main systems of the Environmental Public Interest Litigation surround the Procedure Environmental Rights, which includes subject system, special prepositive system, particular judgement and so on.
环境公益诉讼的主要制度围绕程序性权利的行使展开，其主体制度安排、特殊的前置程序、判决方式都自成特色。
Finally, bring public interest litigation into the scope of legal aid, and balance the relations between environmental public interest protection and exercise of administrative power.
把公益诉讼纳入到法律援助的范围，同时注意平衡环境公益保护与行政权行使之间的关系。
Much of the most important environmental litigation is brought by public interest groups.
大部分重要的环境诉讼都是由公共利益集团提出的。
Public interest environmental litigation aims at reducing the damage to the environment, not compensating the damage to personality and property.
环境公益诉讼旨在减少对环境本身的损害，而不是赔偿对受害者的人身损害和财产损害。
In many countries, public interest litigation is an effective mechanism to suppress behaviors of environmental damage.
公益诉讼是许多国家遏制损害环境公益行为的有效机制。
Environmental administrative public interest litigation is not a new type of litigation, but still administrative litigation with the environmental public interest protection as its target.
环境公益诉讼并不是一种新的诉讼类型，它只是行政诉讼在保护公益环境方面一个特殊的诉讼形式。
The environmental problems which becomes serious daily need the effective legislation objectively, and the environment public interest litigation is the important path from the theory to the practice.
环境问题的日益严重，客观上需要立法加以保障，并确保法律的有效实施，而环境公益诉讼正是环境权从理论到实践的重要途径。
Based on the existing gaps in the limited public interest litigation, the legislation can not effectively address environmental violations to provide adequate legal remedy.
基于现有公益诉讼立法空白的局限，目前我国的立法无法为有效地解决环境侵权问题提供充分的法律救济。
The third part advise that we shall give three kinds of parties the standing of the environmental administrative public interest litigation. They are prosecutor, the public and the NGO.
第三部分对可以提起环境行政公益诉讼的适格原告进行了设想，建议赋予检察机关、公民个人和环保社团这三类主体以原告资格；
USA congress debate on citizen suit in 1970 and Chinese present discussion about public interest environmental litigation are compared in the article.
目前，在世界各国的环境公益诉讼制度中，美国环境公民诉讼制度最具特色，其立法规定与司法实践较为完善和成熟。
USA congress debate on citizen suit in 1970 and Chinese present discussion about public interest environmental litigation are compared in the article.
目前，在世界各国的环境公益诉讼制度中，美国环境公民诉讼制度最具特色，其立法规定与司法实践较为完善和成熟。
应用推荐