This is a top level complex type definition.
以下是顶级复杂类型定义。
Build element definitions as necessary to reference a single complex type definition.
根据需要构建元素定义，以引用单个复杂类型定义。
Make sure to define not only complex type definition, but also the element definition.
确保不仅要定义复杂的类型，还要对元素进行定义。
Use element definitions with the same target namespace as their complex type definition.
元素定义与其复杂类型定义使用同一个目标命名空间。
There is no need to explicitly reference the attribute group in either complex type definition.
无需在每个复杂类型定义中显式地引用属性组。
This is a top level anonymous complex type definition, similar to WebSphere Interchange Server 4.x.
以下是顶级匿名复杂类型定义，与WebSphereInterchangeServer 4 . x类似。
The issue with the above complex type definition can be illustrated with the instance document in Listing 2.
上面这个复杂类型定义的问题可以用清单2中的实例文档来演示。
Therefore, the complex type definition is parsed, and the mapping process creates the following table.
因此，复杂型别定义会经过剖析，而对应处理序则会产生下列表格。
This element declaration and complex type definition have been extracted from the single XForms-Schema.xsd file.
该元素声明和复杂类型定义已经从单独的XForms - Schema . xsd文件中提取出来了。
In Listing 16, the complex type definition contains a sequence of four child elements that are explicitly defined.
在清单16中，复杂类型定义包含一个由4个显式定义的子元素组成的序列。
As with complex type definition, the assertions are an ordered sequence of xs: assertion elements specified as facets in the simple type definition.
和复杂类型定义一样，断言是一组被指定为简单类型定义facet的一组有序的xs：assertion元素序列。
Similarly, you redefine the existing complex type definition pType to add the any element, which supplies the namespace restriction to the XForms namespace.
类似地，重定义已有的复杂类型定义pType以添加any元素，后者对XForms名称空间提供名称空间限制。
You can also add attributes when you extend a type, as in Listing 11, where the ParaType complex type definition is extended to add an attribute for label=.
也可以在扩展一个类型时添加一些属性，如 清单11 所示，其中，ParaType复杂类型定义被扩展为为label= 添加一个属性。
As a consequence, the complex type definition in Listing 1 becomes valid in XML Schema 1.1 because the ambiguity between the element declaration and the wildcard no longer exists.
因此，清单1中的复杂类型定义在XMLSchema 1.1中变得有效，因为元素声明和通配符之间的不确定性已不复存在。
Notice that this method does NOT occur anywhere in the complex data type definition, even though it is public.
请注意，尽管此方法是公共的，但它不会出现在复杂数据类型定义中。
This attribute group definition will automatically be included in each complex type defined in the schema document.
该属性组定义将被自动包含在模式文档中定义的每个复杂类型中。
These changes result in a more complete definition for the Item complex type, shown in Listing 4.
这些更改的结果是一个对于条目复合类型更为完整的定义，如列表4所示。
In the XML schema type definition section of the WSDL document, there is an abstract complex type defined for com.example.Message.
在WSDL文档的XMLschema类型定义部分，有一个为com . example . Message定义的抽象复杂类型。
When you include the XForms schema, you extend the definition of the complex type that defines the content model for the select element — specifically, the type selectType, shown in Listing 3.
包括XForms模式时，扩展了为select元素定义内容模型的复杂类型的定义，即selecttype类型，如清单3所示。
When you include the XForms schema, you extend the definition of the complex type that defines the content model for the select element — specifically, the type selectType, shown in Listing 3.
包括XForms模式时，扩展了为select元素定义内容模型的复杂类型的定义，即selecttype类型，如清单3所示。
应用推荐