The comparison of two algorithms performance in target tracking is presented and the simulation results are also given.
将两种算法在目标跟踪中的性能进行了比较。
Further study on the comparison of the two algorithms on applicability, quality of the reconstruction image and reconstruction speed according computer simulation and experiment has been accomplished.
通过计算机仿真以及实验进一步对这两种重建算法的适用范围、重建质量以及重建速度等方面进行了对比研究。
Then a comparison of efficiency and practicability is made between the two algorithms according to the operation result of cotton disease data.
并结合棉花病虫害数据运行的结果对两种算法的运行效率和实用性进行了比较。
Point-by-point Comparison interpolation is one method of the contour interpolation algorithms, ever used widely in CNC machine tools, but its being not to realize two-axis limits its application.
逐点比较法是轮廓插补算法之一，曾在数控机床中被广泛采用，但由于它存在不能实现两轴联动的缺点，限制了其应用。
Simulations of the two algorithms corresponding to instantaneous optimal control are carried out, and comparison between the two algorithms and instantaneous optimal control algorithm is done.
对基于瞬时最优控制的这两个算法进行了仿真分析，且与瞬时最优控制进行了比较。
The comparison experiment with IMM based on EKF, IMMPF demonstrates the validity of the two algorithms.
最后通过和一般基于EKF的IMM算法、IMMPF算法的比较，验证了这两个算法的有效性。
After comparison with the two modular inverse algorithms, we selected the extended Fermat method from the perspective of improving performance.
对比了两种模逆算法，从提高性能的角度选取了扩展的费尔马方法。
After comparison with the two modular inverse algorithms, we selected the extended Fermat method from the perspective of improving performance.
对比了两种模逆算法，从提高性能的角度选取了扩展的费尔马方法。
应用推荐