Chinese Library Classification; H31 English catalog; category setting;
《中国图书馆分类法》；H31英语类；类目设置；
Chinese Library Classification; Library of Congress Classification; Comparative study.
《中国图书馆分类法》；《美国国会图书馆分类法》；对比研究。
Classification indexing consistency is an important principle and fundamental requirement of Chinese Library Classification.
分类标引一致性是《中图法》的重要原则和基本要求。
Precise using Chinese library classification to index sci-tech periodical is discussed based on character of periodical paper.
从期刊论文的特点出发，探讨了准确规范使用《中国图书馆分类法》标引期刊论文。
The division of the enterprise economy catalogues has been greatly changed in the four editions ol the Chinese Library Classification.
《中图法》四个版本企业经济类目的划分经历了较大变化。
This paper analyzes and studies generally the conception, types, questions in the indicative category of the Chinese Library Classification (4~(th) edition).
本文就《中图法》第四版指示性类目的概念、类型、存在的问题作了综合性的分析研究。
Chinese Library Classification (4th edition) is not suitable for the need of classifying professional literature of some professional categories in libraries.
《中国图书馆分类法》(第4版)在部分专业类目的使用上不适合图书馆文献细分的需要。
The structure of Chinese Library Classification System is huge and its indexing methods and rules are complicated, making it difficult to index academic papers.
《中图法》结构庞大，标引方法和规则复杂，标引学术论文难度大。
Meanwhile, introduce and explain the situations and ideas of revision and the characteristic of the Fifth Version of the Chinese Library Classification. 4 refs.
同时，对网络环境下《中图法》的修订概况、修订思路以及第五版特点介绍和说明。参考文献4。
This paper elaborates the necessity to organize network information automatically along with the method of how to do that by use of "Chinese Library Classification".
论文阐述了利用《中图法》自动组织网络信息资源的必要性，以及如何利用《中图法》自动组织网络信息资源。
The key to classifying journal articles is to get familiar with the category and edition of Chinese Library Classification and correctly grasp the article 's subject.
对高校学报文章进行分类的关键是熟悉《中国图书馆分类法》类目的划分与编排，并正确把握文章的内容。
The Chinese library Classification (4th edition) provides basis for the establishment of the library catalogue system and the organization of library in the new period.
《中图法》四版为新时期图书馆目录体系的建立和馆藏组织提供了依据。
The Chinese Library Classification can only provide classification retrieving while the Colon classification can be used to retrieve both by classification and by theme.
《中图法》只提供分类检索途径，《冒号分类法》既可从分类途径又可从主题途径进行检索。
This paper contrasts and researches Chinese Library Classification (CLC) and Library of Congress Classification (LCC) on the class notes, subdivision schemes and schedule structures.
论文从标记符号、复分表和体系结构三个方面对《中图法》与《美国国会图书馆分类法》进行了对比研究，并给出了两者的类号对照表。
The paper pointed out some questions about colon collocation in Chinese Library Classification, and analyzed these questions, then put forward some suggestions to extend the use of colon collocation.
通过对冒号组配法的类型和作用以及存在问题的探讨，提出扩大使用冒号组配的依据和方法。
The paper analyses and examines, in their entirety, several specific questions, relating to the notes to CLC classes, emerging in application of the 4th edition of the Chinese Library Classification.
本文着重对类目注释在中图法(四版)实际应用中产生的一些具体问题进行全面的分析研究。
The system was primarily created for the classification of Chinese language materials in the Harvard-Yenching Institute Library which was founded in 1927.
这个分类法刚开始是为了分类于1927年建立的哈佛燕京学社图书馆的中文资料而创立的。
The system was primarily created for the classification of Chinese language materials in the Harvard-Yenching Institute Library which was founded in 1927.
这个分类法刚开始是为了分类于1927年建立的哈佛燕京学社图书馆的中文资料而创立的。
应用推荐