The cefpodoxime proxetl and cefuroxime axetil were both efficient.
头孢呋辛普生酯和头孢呋辛酯均有效。
RESULTS The cefpodoxime proxetl and cefuroxime axetil were both efficient (effective rate is 87.50% and 85.37%) and there was no statistically significant difference between them(P>0.05).
结果头孢泊肟与头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道感染的总有效率分别为87.50%和85.37%,两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);
RESULTS The cefpodoxime proxetl and cefuroxime axetil were both efficient (effective rate is 87.50% and 85.37%) and there was no statistically significant difference between them(P>0.05).
结果头孢泊肟与头孢呋辛治疗下呼吸道感染的总有效率分别为87.50%和85.37%,两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);
应用推荐