分析非法证据排除规则的利与弊。
Analyze the advantage and disadvantage of the exclusionary rule.
第三部分，我国非法证据排除规则的研究。
Third part of the rules to exclude illegal evidence of our research.
应完善相关法律，建立非法证据排除规则。
The relevant laws should be perfecting and the regulations for obviating illegal proof should be established.
世界各国非法证据排除规则的比较法研究。
The research of other countries' exclusionary rule in comparing law.
应完善相关法律，建立非法证据排除规则。
The relevant laws should be perfecting and the regulations for obviating I...
并根据该目的建立我国的非法证据排除规则。
Moreover, exclusionary rule and other methods should be constructed on the basis of that purpose.
第三部分：我国适用非法证据排除规则现状。
Part three: the present conditions of applying the rules of excluding illegal evidence in our country.
缺乏完善的非法证据排除规则，而使刑讯逼供的收益稳定。
Inquisition by torture benefits steadily from the absence of the complete exclusion rules of illegal evidences.
非法证据的证明责任是非法证据排除规则的关键性和深层次问题。
The burden of proof of evidence illegally obtained is the substantial and deep problem of the exclusion rule.
从非法证据的概念范围入手，讨论非法证据排除规则的理论界定。
Discuss the theoretical extent starting with the concept of exclusionary rule.
最后，在前述分析基础上，提出确立和完善非法证据排除规则的各种措施。
Finally, depending on the former analyses, this passage will set forward different measures to found and perfect exceptionable rule of illegal proof.
非法证据排除规则是指诉讼中的非法证据不得被采纳为认定事实的依据的规则。
Exclusionary Rule of illegal evidence means illegal evidence isn 't adopted as a basis of ascertainment of facts.
事实上，民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的完善，具有绝对的必要性和重大的意义。
In fact, the founding and maturity of the Rules of Civil Procedure illegal evidence exclusion has the absolute necessity and important meaning.
因此，如何完善民事诉讼非法证据排除规则，就成了法学理论研究者的重要任务。
Therefore, how to improve the rules of civil procedure to exclude illegally obtained evidence, it becomes an important task of legal theory researchers.
非法证据排除规则最早是在英美法系国家确立，而且已经形成了一套完善的体系。
The earliest evidence of illegal exclusionary rule is established in common law countries, and has formed a complete system.
对该问题进行研究，有助于非法证据排除规则真正在我国得以确立并切实发挥作用。
Research of this problem is helpful to establish the exclusion rule and make full use of the rule.
事实上，无论从认识角度还是价值角度，非法证据排除规则都具有完整而坚实的理论依据。
In fact, the exclusionary rules of illegal evidence have integral and stable jurisprudential foundation theoretically from the points of view either of value or cognition.
非法证据排除规则是一项规范证据能力的证据规则，其核心问题是确定非法证据的效力问题。
The exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence is an evidence rule of standardizing credibility, its core problem is evidence potency.
在如何借鉴他国经验完善我国的非法证据排除规则这一点上，有人主张移植“美式”非法证据排除规则。
On the problem of how to establish the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence, some scholars suggest to transplant American exclusionary rule in China.
从目前国外情况看，存在三种非法证据排除规则理论，即虚伪排除理论、人权保障理论和违法控制理论。
There are three kinds of exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence in foreign countries, such as falseness exclusion, human rights protection and unlawful action control.
我国要建立符合国情的科学合理的非法证据排除规则，就必须首先确立我国非法证据排除规则的理论基础。
To constitute a scientific and rational exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence in our country, we must establish the theoretical base.
确立非法证据排除规则，首先需要对该规则本身有一个正确的认识，这是保证建构非法证据排除规则的前提。
Determining the regulation to removal illegal evident first needs a correct acknowledgement to the regulation itself, which is the premise to ensure the regulation of removing illegal evidence.
非法证据排除规则的确立，实际上是一个在惩罚犯罪与保障人权、实体公正与程序公正之间进行价值选择的问题。
The establishment of exclusive rule of illegal evidence is one problem that chooses value between punishing crimes and ensuring human rights, entity and procedure just in fact.
从非法证据的概念和排除规则入手，分析非法证据排除规则的理论基础，提出了我国确立非法证据排除规则的可行性。
From the concept and rule of dimination, analyses the theory basis of illegal rule of evidence dimination, puts forward the feasibility to establish illegal rule of evidence in our country.
在明确非法证据内涵的基础上借鉴各国相关制度规定，论述在我国建立非法证据排除规则的现实意义并提出初步构想。
In China, how to establish the exclusionary rule for illegally obtain evidence is a focus problem in theory and practice.
因此，本文试图从法院视角和当事人视角来对我国的民事诉讼非法证据排除规则展开探讨，这便是本文第四和第五部分的内容。
Therefore, this article attempts to view the courts and parties perspective on China's rule of excluding illegally obtained evidence in civil proceedings commenced to explore.
因此，本文试图从法院视角和当事人视角来对我国的民事诉讼非法证据排除规则展开探讨，这便是本文第四和第五部分的内容。
Therefore, this article attempts to view the courts and parties perspective on China's rule of excluding illegally obtained evidence in civil proceedings commenced to explore.
应用推荐