陪审制是公民参与司法审判的主要方式之一。
Jury system is one of the important methods of the people's judicature.
公众参加审判有陪审制和参审制两种模式。
There are two models whereby the general public may participate in trial: by jury or by the peoples assessors.
现今世界有陪审团制和参审制两种陪审制度。
At present there is jury system in world with three review to make two kinds of jury systems.
通过上述方面的完善，真正让人民陪审制在我国发挥其应有作用。
Through the above aspect consummation, truly lets the people jury system display in our country its should have the function.
陪审制具体又可分为英美法系的陪审团制度和大陆法系的参审制。
This system consists of jury system in common law system and trial system of people's assessors in continental law system.
通过分析对比，我们才会在对待人民陪审制的存废问题上更富理性。
After the analysis and comparison can we be more rational to the question whether we'd keep or annul the people's jury system.
介绍了我国人民陪审员制度的现状，以及对其是完善还是取消的争论，并分析了陪审制的本质和功能。
This paper reviews the present situation of jury system and the dispute of perfecting and abolishing on jury system in our country.
从我国使用陪审制的整体状况来看，各地对陪审制的使用不多，且存在着地区、案件类别的不平衡现象。
From the using of our jury system, as a whole, it has a small range of using, and also imbalanced of using in the types of cases.
在英美法系之中，由于这种陪审制有着相当长的历史作为积淀，所以，相关的问题已经得到了很好的解决。
There is no serious problem in the counterpart of British and American system, as it has experienced a long history, during which many disadvantages and defects have been solved.
造成这种差异的主要原因是英美法系国家实行陪审制、采用了对抗制的诉讼模式并强调对案件的集中审理原则。
The employment of jury, the adversary fact-finding system and the concentrated proceedings contribute to the differences of two legal systems.
基于此，本文从诉讼文化、诉讼制度的视角出发，通过比较分析，试图论证人民陪审制在当前中国的不可行性。
This paper will discuss and prove the infeasibility of system of people's jurors in current China from the lawsuit culture and judicial system's Angle, through a method of comparative analysis.
刑讯逼供制度是法定证据制度无法实现的结果；而辩诉交易盛行则反映了当代英美对抗性陪审制无法成为普遍程序的现实。
The law of torture comes from the unpractical legal proof system while the law of plea bargaining comes from the impractical jury system.
刑讯逼供制度是法定证据制度无法实现的结果；而辩诉交易盛行则反映了当代英美对抗性陪审制无法成为普遍程序的现实。
The law of torture comes from the unpractical legal proof system while the law of plea bargaining comes from the impractical jury system.
应用推荐