语用推理的根本立足点就是语境。
交际中话语理解离不开语用推理。
In verbal communication, pragmatic inference is necessary for utterance understanding.
论文着重分析关联理论对语用推理的解释。
This paper analyzes pragmatic inference in relevance theory.
本文主要探讨语篇的隐性连贯及其语用推理机制。
The present paper mainly discusses the covert coherence and its pragmatic inference mechanism.
第四章讨论语用推理模式给阅读教学带来的启示；
The fourth part explores what implications pragmatic inferential model bring to the teaching of EFL reading.
语用推理就是实现二者的由此达彼、由彼达此的桥梁。
Pragmatic inference plays a role as a bridge to realize their transition.
语用推理能力关系到话语理解的正误，是维系会话的关键。
Pragmatic inference competence determines whether the utterance can be correctly understood and plays an important role in maintaining the conversation.
语境在人们对会话含意的语用推理过程中起着至关重要的作用。
Only relevance in the inferential process is an invariable, and it is inevitable.
语用推理是人的一种认知活动，而人的认知结构和认知环境是多变的。
Pragmatic inference is a kind of cognitive behavior, while people's cognitive structure and their cognitive environment are different.
本文阐述了认知语境和语用推理两个重要因素，探讨有意歧义的认知机制。
This thesis sets forth cognitive context and pragmatic inference, the two important factors, to explore the cognitive mechanism of intentional ambiguity.
因此在关联理论中，话语的明示意义就是语言解码和语用推理结合的产物。
Thus, the explicature is a kind of semantic-pragmatic hybrid with the interaction of linguistically encoded meaning and pragmatically inferred meaning.
因此，从认知语言学的角度来研究语用推理可进一步补充和丰富语用学理论。
Thus investigating pragmatic inferencing from a Cognitive Linguistic perspective can further supplement and enrich the pragmatic theories.
会话含义属于语用推理，因而也必须合乎民族语境的大背景和民族的表达习惯。
The implication of conversation belongs to the pragmatic inference, therefore it must accord with the big background of the national context of situation and the national expressing habit.
本文认为关联理论的研究为低调陈述的语用推理和语用意义的研究奠定了理论基础。
The research on the topic of the Relevance Theory will lay a theoretical foundation for the further study on pragmatic inferences and the interpretation of pragmatic meaning of understatement.
语言交际中的语用推理过程实际上是人们在语境的参与下完成交际的心理认知过程。
The process of pragmatic inference in communication is actually a mental cognitive process of communication affected by cognitive contexts.
认知语境为语用推理提供了一种手段，而推理是以关联原则和最佳关联假设为基础。
The pragmatic inference is based on the principles of relevance and the presumptions of optimal relevance.
心理语言学家认为隐喻与人们普遍的思维和认知方式相一致，不需要复杂的语用推理。
Psycholinguists holds that metaphorical thinking fits in with peoples general conceptual pattern and cognitive thinking pattern, and does not need complicated pragmatic reasoning.
本文探讨语言环境对语篇的影响及语用推理，分析语篇语用推理的前提、过程、结论。
The Essay elucidates the impact of linguistic environment upon discourse and linguistic reasoning, and analyses the premise, process and conclusion of the linguistic reasoning of discourse.
最后探讨了交际中的语用推理的几种主要类型，即索引词推理、会话隐含推理、预设推理。
Finally, the present study explores several major types of pragmatic reasoning: indexical reasoning, implicit reasoning and prepositional reasoning.
许多语用学家认为语用推理无法用形式系统来刻画，只能用非形式的甚至是隐喻性的语汇来描述。
In the eyes of many, pragmatic inference has often been seen as a subject that defies formal characterizations and is describable only in non-formal, sometimes metaphorical terms.
他们的研究表明，大多数的语用推理本质上都是借代，因此间接言语行为可以用借代模型来描述。
They also demonstrate that much of pragmatic inferencing is metonymic in nature and believed that indirect speech ACTS can be described in terms of metonymic models.
本文还对语用推理的模式进行了了探讨，指出语用推理应该建立在动态性和静态性相结合的语境基础上。
The thesis also exploits the mode of pragmatic inference, puts forward that the pragmatic inference should be founded on the basis of the combination of static state and dynamic state.
语用推理的模式不是单纯的演绎或归纳，而是多种推理方式的综合运用，语用推理的形式化研究是有意义的。
The mode of pragmatic inference is not a usage of single deduction or induction, but a integrated usage of various inference ways, so the research on the form of pragmatic inference is meaningful.
如何在一定语言形式的基础上，根据语境进行语用推理，从而确定话语的意义，这是语用学和语言逻辑一直寻求解决的问题。
Pragmatics and linguistic logic have been applied to resolve the problem of how to make pragmatic inference on the basis of syntax and context so that the meaning of the utterance could be defined.
如何在一定语言形式的基础上，根据语境进行语用推理，从而确定话语的意义，这是语用学和语言逻辑一直寻求解决的问题。
Pragmatics and linguistic logic have been applied to resolve the problem of how to make pragmatic inference on the basis of syntax and context so that the meaning of the utterance could be defined.
应用推荐