认知语用学是近年来国内外语言学研究中涌现出来的一个新的研究方向与趋势。
Cognitive pragmatics is a new approach to the study of natural language use and its framework is in development.
反语研究的角度从传统的修辞学和美学转向了认知心理学和语用学的探究。
The traditional study of verbal irony from rhetorical and aesthetical approaches has been shifted to current cognitive and pragmatic investigation.
本文试图立足语用学，以话语为核心，结合认知心理学的研究成果，尝试对语境作一科学阐释。
This paper tries to give a scientific interpretation of context, based on pragmatics, centered on discourse and combined with the achievements in cognitive psychology.
本文借用查奈尔的有关定义和分类，并做补充修正，从认知语用学的基础—关联理论的角度对模糊语言进行了研究。
Based on Channell's relevant definition and classification, this paper studies English vague language from the perspective of relevance theory which is the base of cognitive pragmatics.
隐喻不仅是一种语用现象，其实也是人类的一种思维机制，因此，隐喻也可从认知的角度去研究。
Therefore, metaphor is not only a language phenomenon, and it is in fact also a kind of thinking mechanism, so the study of metaphor based on human cognition is suggested in this paper.
同时，对于“从”字句的语用和认知领域的研究综述也可以促进各学科间的交流。
At the same time, for the words "from" pragmatic and cognitive research reviewed also can promote the communication between each subject.
语法、语义和语用等问题都可进行认知方面的新的研究。
Problems in the aspects of grammar, semantics and pragmatics have invoked a new cognitive study.
当然作为认知语用学这一较为复杂学科的研究成果，最佳关联性因不能准确地进行量化也存在一定的局限性。
Of course as the achievement in the research of cognitive pragmatics, a complex discipline, the optimal relevance has also its weakness.
除了传统的微观语用学以外，他们还研究话语分析、功能语法和认知语法等。
In addition to micro-pragmatics, they also work on topics as regards discourse analysis, functional grammar and cognitive grammar.
本文的关注点是语用歧义的认知机制研究。
The concern of this research is the cognitive mechanism of pragmatic ambiguity.
反语研究的角度从传统的修辞学和美学转向了认知心理学和语用学的探究。
The traditional study of verbal irony has been shifted from rhetorical and aesthetical approaches to current cognitive and pragmatic investigation.
语用学和认知语言学为反语的研究提供了不同的视角。
Pragmatics and cognitive linguistics provide different perspectives for irony study.
关联理论是一种研究人类交际的认知语用理论。
Relevance theory is a cognitive pragmatic theory which explores how people communicate.
另一类研究则跳出了修辞学的领域更多的从认知和语用的角度来研究仿拟。
Opposite to the former one, the other is to study parody outside rhetorical field, namely, from pragmatic and cognitive perspective.
因此，从认知语言学的角度来研究语用推理可进一步补充和丰富语用学理论。
Thus investigating pragmatic inferencing from a Cognitive Linguistic perspective can further supplement and enrich the pragmatic theories.
本文从语用的角度，结合认知语法的理论一可及性理论，通过英汉两种语言中大量生活语言的实例，深入研究两种语言中的回指现象。
Following the perspective of pragmatics and cognitive theory-accessibility theory, it gives a deep analysis of anaphora phenomena existing in two languages by illustrating a large amount of examples.
本文主要以语言转述现象的认知语用特征为研究对象。
This paper is mainly intended to take as its subject the cognitive_pragmatic features of language reports.
从人的认知能力、文化差异和语用模糊三方面探讨了歧义产生的主要非语言性因素，着重研究了人类对于隐喻含意和一词多义现象的认知模式。
This paper concerns the three main nonlinlinguistic factors of ambiguity -cognitive ability, cultural differences and pragmatic vagueness, especially the cognitive model of metaphor and polysemy.
本文首先简单介绍了否定在语义学中的特点，分类及其在语用学中的研究地位，然后从认知语言学的角度对否定进行了尝试性的研究。
This paper, on the basis of a brief discussion of negation in the field of semantics and pragmatics, makes a tentative attempt to the study of negation from a cognitive perspective.
言据性研究经历了从拓扑学角度到认知、认知情态、叙事学和语用学等角度的历程。
Evidential study went through from the perspective of typology to that of cognition, epistemic modality, narratology and pragmatics.
本文根据国外语用和认知方面的研究理论专门探讨名词（短）语特别是有定名词语在语篇中的可推知照应的用法。
This article explores specially the use of inferable anaphoric NPs, esp. definite NPs, in discourse based on some foreigners' pragmatic and cognitive studies.
尽管如此，在认知、语用视角下如关联理论、认知域理论等对幽默的研究仍有很多不足之处值得完善。
However, studies on humor from cognitive and pragmatic perspectives such as Relevance Theory and cognitive domains still remain great gaps for improving.
本文首先分析了话语标记语的语用研究中存在的三种主要的视角，即以话语连贯为中心的研究视角、句法一语用视角和认知语用学的视角。
We first analyze three pragmatic perspectives on discourse markers, namely, the discourse-coherence-based perspective, the grammatical-pragmatic perspective, and the cognitive-pragmatic perspective.
本文首先分析了话语标记语的语用研究中存在的三种主要的视角，即以话语连贯为中心的研究视角、句法一语用视角和认知语用学的视角。
We first analyze three pragmatic perspectives on discourse markers, namely, the discourse-coherence-based perspective, the grammatical-pragmatic perspective, and the cognitive-pragmatic perspective.
应用推荐