我国行政诉讼的举证责任的规定及为什么规定行政诉讼中被告负有举证责任?。
This present paper discusses the testimony responsibility of the administrative organization in the administrative lawsuit in China.
行政诉讼证明标准同行政诉讼举证责任一道，构成行政诉讼证据理论的核心。
Testimony standard and burden of proof of administrative litigation form the core of the evidence theory of administrative litigation.
我国行政诉讼中的举证责任，应在借鉴国外的理论的基础上，根据我国的审判制度、法律传统以及法官制度的结构，来确定我国举证责任的理念。
The idea of burden of proof in our administration action should be based on foreign theories and our system of judgement and structure of law tradition or magistrate system.
行政诉讼被告对具体行政行为的合法性负举证责任，这是众所周知的一种法定的举证责任分配方式。
It is well known that the burden of proof for the concrete administrative act rests with the defendant at the administrative procedure.
然而，行政诉讼第三人在司法实践中的情形往往比较复杂，不同类型的第三人所享有的诉讼权利、承担的诉讼义务和举证责任也不尽相同。
However, the situation of the judicial practice is complex, so the different type of the third party has different litigation rights and incurs different litigation obligation and the burden of proof.
行政诉讼举证责任是在双方当事人举证能力穷尽，而案件的证明仍处于“悬案”状态下所启用的一种司法推测机制。
When both parties exhausted abilities of burden of proof, it applies to one kind of mechanism of judiciary conjecture if the case proven still is in the situation of unsettled law case.
行政诉讼举证责任是在双方当事人举证能力穷尽，而案件的证明仍处于“悬案”状态下所启用的一种司法推测机制。
When both parties exhausted abilities of burden of proof, it applies to one kind of mechanism of judiciary conjecture if the case proven still is in the situation of unsettled law case.
应用推荐