阻止商品、服务以及资本的跨界自由流动是十分危险的，因为想要使市场发挥作用，你就必须令套利发挥作用。
Preventing the free flow of goods and services and capital across international boundaries. That is a danger because in order for markets to work, you need arbitrage to work.
从某种意义上说，现在是时候举起烫热的酒杯，祝愿一下欧盟的四种自由运动了：人员，商品，服务，首都。
Time, then, to raise a glass of mulled wine to the EU’s four freedoms of movement: people, goods, services and capital? Up to a point.
从某种意义上说，现在是时候举起烫热的酒杯，祝愿一下欧盟的四种自由运动了：人员，商品，服务，首都。
Time, then, to raise a glass of mulled wine to the EU's four freedoms of movement: people, goods, services and capital? Up to a point.
据说，单一市场是欧盟的重大成就，并且这一进展的四大自由——人民、商品、服务、资本——是值得保护的。
That said, the single market is one of the EU's big achievements, and its "four freedoms" of movement-of people, goods, services and capital-are worth defending.
但在自由市场，商品和服务都取决于客户需要，对于下流作品的需要被现有的法令是为不应存在的。
But in a free market, goods and services are determined by customer demand, and demand for obscene material as defined by the existing legislation is virtually nonexistent.
它只是涉及到在自由社会里商品和服务如何配置的问题。
It's how goods and services get allocated in a free society.
在一个自由及充分竞争的市场，要获取利润企业就要通过商品以及服务取悦消费者。
In a free and competitive market, firms profit by selling goods or services to willing customers.
咨询公司埃森哲的一项研究发现，德国消费者更愿意接受服务水平较低、较少自由定制，但价格较低的商品。
A study by Accenture, a consulting firm, found that Germans were far more willing to accept lower levels of service or fewer product options if it would mean paying less.
冷战结束后的20年，信息、人员、商品和服务都以前所未有的速度加速自由流动。
In the two decades since the end of the Cold War, the free flow of information, people, goods and services has accelerated at an unprecedented rate.
一个全球化的经济就意味着商品、服务、资本和劳动力能够完全自由移动。
A global economy would mean complete freedom of movement of goods and services, capital, and labor.
因此，“达沃斯人”仍然可以在金融领域想怎么冒险就怎么冒险，但再也不能与之前同样自由地交易商品和服务了。
So Davos people could still take whatever financial risks they wanted but could no longer trade as freely in goods and services.
因此，“达沃斯人”仍然可以在金融领域想怎么冒险就怎么冒险，但再也不能与之前同样自由地交易商品和服务了。
So Davos people could still take whatever financial risks they wanted but could no longer trade as freely in goods and services.
应用推荐