第四部分是纯粹经济损失赔偿问题的比较法研究。
The fourth part is comparison research on the question of pure economic loss compensation.
第三部分是纯粹经济损失赔偿与否的法律政策考量。
The third part is law and policy consideration on whether to pay compensation to pure economic loss.
本文分三个部分：第一部分为“纯粹经济损失概述”。
This article in three parts:The first part was "pure economic loss overview."
纯粹经济损失是非由人身或财产引起的经济上的损失。
Pure economic loss is the loss which dose not result from the physical damage to person and property.
第四章，是我国纯粹经济损失赔偿制度的现状及其展望。
The fourth part describes the present situation and prospects about compensation system of pure economic loss in our country.
第二部分为“纯粹经济损失赔偿案件的几种典型处理模式”。
The second part was "purely economic damages cases, some typical processing model."
纯粹经济损失是指非由人身或财产受到侵害引起的经济上的损失。
The Pure economic loss is economic loss which is not caused by Personal or property damage.
这种责任的形成是与法律对不实陈述导致的纯粹经济损失的认可相联系的。
The formation of this kind of responsibility is related to the law's stipulation that the pure economic losses are caused by false state.
从多个角度对其进行了分类，并描述了纯粹经济损失在损害分类体系中的地位。
This article classified it from many angles and described status of pure economic loss in the harm classification system.
由于我国对纯粹经济损失制度的研究较晚，并没有形成一套对其完善的处理机制。
The research on pure economic loss is later in china, And it is not formed a perfect mechanism for pure economic loss yet.
第二部分主要从比较法的角度考察一些主要国外国家对于纯粹经济损失的处理模式。
The second part reviewed some countries how to deal with pour economic loss from the view of comparison method.
本文对类型化下的纯粹经济损失是否应该赔偿，如果应该赔偿的话有哪些类型应该赔偿。
The article analyzed the different categories of pure economic loss and point out which categories should be recovered.
不论是大陆法还是英美法，自19世纪以来都一直存在着一种对于纯粹经济损失的排除原则。
Both in Civil law and Common law, the pure economic loss cannot be compensated since 19th century.
在我国司法实践中，有些损失虽未以纯粹经济损失的面目出现，但却具有了纯粹经济损失的内容。
Some loss is not appeared on behalf of the pure economic loss in Judicial practice of China, But the content is pure economic loss.
同时，纯粹经济损失赔偿问题也为反思和重构侵权与合同二元民事责任体系提供了一个独特的视角。
Meanwhile, it provides a special perspective on reflection and reconstruction on the liability system for tort and contract in the problem of compensation for pure economic loss.
虽然比较法上并没有一致的解决路径，但仍可从其中发现实现纯粹经济损失赔偿与责任控制的一些相同的理性因素。
Notwithstanding there is not a consistent solution path, we can find some consistent rational factors in realizing and controlling the liability of compensation for pure economic loss.
本文针对上述问题，通过比较法视角，并结合我国侵权责任法相关规定，以及相关司法判例对纯粹经济损失赔偿制度进行研究。
This article address the problem, by Comparative Perspective, combined with the relevant provisions of China's Tort Law and the relevant jurisprudence of the system of pure economic loss.
纯粹经济损失是指“除了受害人的人身损害和财产的有形损害以外的、也不是因为受害人的人身损害和财产的有形损害引起的一种纯粹经济利益上的损失。
Pure economic loss is regarded as a independent issue due to the idea of classes in social welfare, however, only the pure economic loss resulted by direct reasons has unique regulative values.
纯粹经济损失是指“除了受害人的人身损害和财产的有形损害以外的、也不是因为受害人的人身损害和财产的有形损害引起的一种纯粹经济利益上的损失。
Pure economic loss is regarded as a independent issue due to the idea of classes in social welfare, however, only the pure economic loss resulted by direct reasons has unique regulative values.
应用推荐