类比法律推理与作为法律续造之法的类推制度、类推解释并不处于同一对话语境。
The legal reasoning by analogy, the analogizing system as a way to rebuild laws and the interpretation by analogy are not in the same context of a dialogue.
解决之道在于合理运用刑法解释方法类推解释、扩张解释与类比解释。
It is the way to solve this problem that we can use explanation method in criminal law, the analogy explanation, the amplified explanation and the substantial analogy explanation.
一般多从税收法定主义、法的安定性和可预测性、类推适用在税法中的复效性问题以及将税法与刑法相类比等方面出发，提出在税法中禁止类推适用的理由。
Their reasons are the principal of tax legal prescription, security and predictability of law, negative effect of analogy in tax law and comparing tax law with criminal law.
一般多从税收法定主义、法的安定性和可预测性、类推适用在税法中的复效性问题以及将税法与刑法相类比等方面出发，提出在税法中禁止类推适用的理由。
Their reasons are the principal of tax legal prescription, security and predictability of law, negative effect of analogy in tax law and comparing tax law with criminal law.
应用推荐