行为问题发生率及社交焦虑量表分高于对照组。
The incidence of behavioral problem and score of SASC in EG were higher than that of CG.
两组被试在UCLA孤独量表与社交焦虑量表上得分的差异也达到显著性水平。
There is also notable difference in the score of UCLA Loneliness Scale and Interaction Anxiousness Scale between the two groups.
儿童社交焦虑量表的得分在认知偏差上存在显著差异，而情境的主效应不显著。
The scores in SASC have significant differences in cognitive biases, but not in situations.
方法：采用社交焦虑量表(IAS)，个人评价问卷(PEI)，自编社交技能和他信问卷对194名大学生被试进行测试。
Method: Interaction Anxiety Scale (IAS), Personality Evaluation Inventory (PEI), Social Skill Inventory and Faith in People Scale are performed in 194 normal university students.
目的：翻译并修订社会交往焦虑量表(SIAS)和社交恐惧量表(SPS)，并考察其心理测量学特征。
Objective: To revise the social Interaction anxiety Scale (SIAS) and social Phobia Scale (SPS), which are self-related social anxiety measurements developed by Mattick and his colleagues.
结果两组抑郁自评量表（SDS）、焦虑自评量表（SAS）、社交回避及苦恼量表（SAD）、症状自评量表（SCL-90）因子评分（除偏执、精神病性外）比较，差异有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。
Results The scores of SDS, SAS, SAD, and SCL-90 except the factors of paranoid ideation and psychoticism showed significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05 for all).
结果两组抑郁自评量表（SDS）、焦虑自评量表（SAS）、社交回避及苦恼量表（SAD）、症状自评量表（SCL-90）因子评分（除偏执、精神病性外）比较，差异有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。
Results The scores of SDS, SAS, SAD, and SCL-90 except the factors of paranoid ideation and psychoticism showed significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05 for all).
应用推荐