结论：与常规的右心室心尖部起搏比较，右心室间隔部起搏同样安全，操作简单易行。
Conclusion: Compared with right ventricular apex pacing, right ventricular septal pacing is clinically feasible and safe.
目的比较右心室间隔部与右心室心尖部起搏对血流动力学的影响。
Objective To compare the hemodynamic changes of right ventricular septal pacing with traditional right ventricular apical pacing.
【摘要】目的以右心室心尖部起搏为参照，评估右心室间隔部起搏的双心室电同步性和血流动力学效应。
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the biventricular electrical synchronism and hemodynamics in the right ventricular septum (RVS) pacing compared with traditional right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing.
目的以右心室心尖部起搏为参照，评估右心室间隔部起搏的双心室电同步性和血流动力学效应。
Abstract :Objective To evaluate the biventricular electrical synchronism and hemodynamics in the right ventricular septum (RVS) pacing compared with traditional right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing.
目的以右心室心尖部起搏为参照，评估右心室间隔部起搏的双心室电同步性和血流动力学效应。
Objective To evaluate the biventricular electrical synchronism and hemodynamics in the right ventricular septum (RVS) pacing compared with traditional right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing.
目的以右心室心尖部起搏为参照，评估右心室间隔部起搏的双心室电同步性和血流动力学效应。
Objective To evaluate the biventricular electrical synchronism and hemodynamics in the right ventricular septum (RVS) pacing compared with traditional right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing.
应用推荐