疼痛评分和功能评分均获得改善。
累积疼痛评分确定疼痛行为。
A cumulative pain score was utilized to assess pain behavior.
在这项研究中2个治疗组的疼痛评分测量也差不多。
Pain scores measured in this study were also similar between the 2 treatment groups.
结果：手术前和手术后鞘内注射新斯的明均可降低累积疼痛评分。
Results: IT NEO before or after incision both decreased the cumulative pain scores.
对两组的疼痛评分、产程时间等作比较，分析对比两组的临床效果。
Compared pain scores in both groups, labor and time for comparison and the effect.
监测血流动力学、麻醉并发症，进行术后VAS疼痛评分及OAAS意识评分。
Monitored hemodynamics and anesthesia complication, and made postoperative VAS pain score and OAAS consciousness score.
该疗法似乎有持续效果：在接受该治疗操作的24周后，平均疼痛评分只有1.7分。
The treatment appeared to have lasting effects: 24 weeks after undergoing the procedure, the average pain score was just 1.7 points.
主要结果衡量标准：止痛前和闭合手法复位期间应用目测类比疼痛评分标准进行评价。
Main Outcome Measurements: the visual analog pain scale was used before analgesic administration and during the closed manipulative reduction.
在该研究开始的时候，在10分的疼痛评分尺度上，这些患者的疼痛评分平均为7.2分。
At the start of the study, their pain score averaged 7.2 points on a 10-point scale.
所有患者的疼痛评分、Frankel分级和血液参数等的改变，均显示出明显的临床改善。
Changes in pain score, Frankel's classification, and blood parameters demonstrated a significant clinical improvement in all patients.
前瞻性比较两组术后疼痛评分、运动功能指数、排便受阻时间、住院时间及创面愈合时间的差异。
Such indexes as postoperative pain score, movement function index, hospitalization time and wound healing time were compared between two groups prospectively.
前瞻性比较两组间术后疼痛评分、运动功能指数、排便受阻时间、住院时间及创面愈合时间的差异。
Such indexes as postoperative pain score, movement function index, obstructive bowl movement time, hospitalization time and wound healing time were compared between the two groups.
本研究的目的是评价是否CRPC男性而合并较高疼痛评分的患者其临床结果差于疼痛评分低分者。
The objective of this study was to determine whether men with CRPC who had higher pain interference scores at baseline had worse clinical outcomes compared with men who had lower pain scores.
结果两组患者疼痛评分、术后生理功能恢复状况及镇痛不良反应(除出汗)比较，差异有统计学意义。
Result There is significant difference on scores of pain, rehabilitation of post-operative physical function and adverse reactions of analgesia (except sweating) between two groups.
比较两组患者的术前疼痛评分、术中分期、手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛缓解效果及术后并发症等。
The pre-operative pain scores, intra-operative staging Results, surgical duration, intra-surgical blood loss, post-operative pain relief were compared between these two groups.
Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)用来评估术前、术后1和2年情况。
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog pain scores (VAS) were evaluated preoperative, 1 and 2 years postoperative.
D组在创面换药过程中、结束后各时相点的疼痛评分均较换药前疼痛评分增高，差异有显著性（P0.05）。
The pain score of D group step up remarkably at every phase point in the mid-dressing changes and post-dressing changes than in the pro-dressing changes(P0.05).
镜检术后立即将患者术中痛感记录在视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)量表上(0 ~10分)，同时记录呼吸频率及脉率。
Patients' pain feeling were recorded on an VAS (visual analog pain scale) ranging from 0 to 10 after flexible cystoscopy. The pulse and respiratory rate were also recorded.
试验的研究者应该扩大纳入受试者标准，包括高度近视患者，并且应评估视力、屈光、上皮愈合时间、疼痛评分和不良事件。
Trial investigators should expand enrollment criteria to include participants with high myopia and should evaluate visual acuity, refraction, epithelial healing time, pain scores, and adverse events.
结果两组患者术后各观察时点疼痛评分均<2分，组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），两组镇痛满意率为100%；
Results The analgesic scores at all time-points in two groups were less than 2 and there were no significant difference between two groups( P>0.05). The superior rate of analgesia are 100%.
注射前用Verbal疼痛评分系统（VPS）及Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）对患者进行评价，6周后采用同样的疗效指标再次评价。
Patients were assessed before injection using the Verbal Pain Score (VPS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). They were reassessed after 6 weeks using the same outcome measures.
根据数字评分量表（NRS）评估200名晚期癌症患者的疼痛程度。
Evaluate pain degrees of 200 late staged cancer patients against the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
然而，在评估18岁以下患者疼痛或是术后满意度时，需要更加敏感的测量方法用以补充SRS - 22评分。
However, more sensitive measurements may be needed to supplement the SRS-22 in assessing Pain in patients below 18 years or Satisfaction after surgery.
采用疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分对两组患者的疼痛程度进行效果评价。
Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were used to assess the pain degree of patients in the two groups.
在痉挛、神经性疼痛和最终的ASIA评分之间无明显相关性。
No significant correlation was found between or among the presence of spasticity, neuropathic pain, and ASIA score at final visit.
目的：通过对术后疼痛的评分，评价可乐定超前镇痛对颈部手术后镇痛的临床效果。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of clonidine pretreatment on pain after cervical surgery by recording pain scores.
使用美国肩肘外科医师协会(ases)评分标准判定疼痛程度。
Pain was measured with use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Elbow Evaluation instrument.
术后疼痛由视觉模拟评分和言语反应形式评定。
Postoperative pain was evaluated with use of a visual analogue scale and a verbal response form.
采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评定病人的疼痛程度及治疗结果。
Degree of pain and results of treatment were scored by visual analogue scale (VAS).
采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评定病人的疼痛程度及治疗结果。
Degree of pain and results of treatment were scored by visual analogue scale (VAS).
应用推荐