这些争论中的观点也会对理性造成损害。
这个研究团体显示，有关人的本性，强调个人主义和理性的法国启蒙观点是错误的。
This body of research suggests the French enlightenment view of human nature, which emphasized individualism and reason, was wrong.
根据有限理性的观点，个人作出的决策会受到个人知识、认知局限和时间的制约。
Bounded Rationality is the idea that individual decision making is limited by personal information, cognitive limitations, and time constraints.
对本报的很多读者来讲，这个观点是不言自明的，因为他们都是文化启明运动和理性主义的后裔。
For many readers of this newspaper, descendents of the Enlightenment and rationalists all, such a view might seem self-evident.
这些关于合理性的观点，其根源来自于人们有限的以及错误的对合理性思维的看法，同时与现代认知科学对合理性的研究不相符合。
These ideas about rationality derive from a restricted and mistaken view of rational thought - one not in accord with the study of rationality in modern cognitive science.
过去40年发生多次金融危机之后，大多数理性的人开始接受这一观点：金融市场可以有泡沫。
After so many financial crises in the past 40 years most reasonable people would now accept that bubbles in asset markets can exist.
坚信理性和自由的经济学家往往也同意自由派的观点。
Economists, with their strong faith in rationality and liberty, have tended to agree.
这些批评通常出现在别人的博客上，(只要他们是理性的)我会试着亲自转帖他们的观点。
These attacks usually appear on other people's blogs, and (as long as they're rational) I try to repost them on my own.
但是依赖投资人是理性的那种观点看来使事情更复杂了。
But relying on the notion of rational investors seems to complicate matters.
我意识到有些人，与其让他们理解、尊重或甚至忍受它，他们更愿意强调他们的观点来证明吃肉的合理性。
I've learned that some people, rather than be understanding, respectful or even tolerable about it, would rather argue their own point to justify their meat eating.
在18世纪和19世纪，很多天文学家都相信这样一个神学观点：所有的宇宙天体都被“理性存在”所占据。
In the 18th and 19th centuries, many astronomers were persuaded, by this very theological argument, that just about every cosmic body was inhabited by rational beings.
但通过把重点放在穷人无法采取理性和深思熟虑的行动，威尔逊希望我们放弃那种自莫伊尼汉之后盛行的受害者观点的潮流。
But by focusing on the capacity of the poor to act rationally and thoughtfully, Wilson wants us to get off the victimhood bandwagon that followed Moynihan.
我下一次要做的就是，继续这个讨论，并且观察一个更为理性的，关于化学世界的观点，周五见。
And so what I'm going to do the next day is return to this discussion, and take a look at a more rational view of the chemical world. So, we'll see you on Friday.
他们的姿态可以理解，或许从理性的立场来看，他们早就该采取这种观点。
Their take on things is understandable and perhaps, from a rational standpoint, long overdue.
经济学家们倾向于看到人类的潜力被激发、观点趋于理性与生活完美而得以自满于世——这是何等的可笑！
Economists have tended to content themselves with a laughably simple picture of human motivation, rationality and well-being.
上述观点使理性薄弱这种情况置于完全不同的境地。
这和耶鲁大学心理学家保罗·布鲁姆（Paul Bloom）的观点不谋而合，他说：“哲学家经常需要定义人类的基本特征——语言、理性和文化等等。
Or as Paul Bloom, a Yale psychologist, puts it, “Philosophers have often looked for the defining feature of humans — language, rationality, culture and so on.
实际和理性也意味着他们很难耐心对待那些缺乏常识或者容易被大众观点所左右的人。
This also means they have little patience for those who lack common sense, or those who are easily influenced by popular opinions.
对于我们在花钱时会做出仔细而合理的决定这一“人类是理性的”观点，以上这些观点无疑是致命一击。
So it's another nail in the coffin for the rational view of humanity, that we think carefully and logically about the decisions we make with money.
布鲁克斯抱怨政策过于频繁地依赖于一种关于人性的很简单，十分理性主义的观点。
Mr Brooks complains that policies too frequently rely on an overly simplistic, rationalist view of human nature.
这就是来自，理性主义传统的观点，它认为生活是一个问题，并且是哲学家的工作，来在最深层次处理这个问题。
That's the view that comes from the rationalist tradition in which life was thought to be a problem, and it's the job of philosophers to deal with that problem at its deepest levels.
这种消失的观点瓦解了除自利和自助终极目标的理性化算计之外的其他似是而非的动机。
This negative view dismisses alternative plausible motivations beyond self-interest and beyond rational calculation of self-serving ends.
寻找一种均衡和严谨的观点，避免理性的自利观点。
Seek a balanced, humble view that reaches beyond rational self-interest.
理性的人不会赞成这一政策收益超过风险的观点。
Reasonable people can disagree about whether its benefits outweigh the risks.
这其实是一种理性主义的观点。
这其实是一种理性主义的观点。
应用推荐