这项研究成果已经被发布到了网络上，并提交给《物理学评论》杂志。
The results have now been posted on the Internet and submitted to the Physical Review.
简而言之，根据巴贝和他的同事在地球物理学评论快报上的最新解释，卫星照片的分析结果是错误的。
In short, as Barber and his colleagues explain in a recent paper in Geophysical Review Letters, the analysis of what the satellites were seeing was wrong.
这份文档将会提交给《地球物理学评论》，一份科学杂志，汉森今天在一封e - mail中说到。
The document will be submitted to Reviews of Geophysics, a scientific journal, Hansen said today in an E-mail.
这份文档将会提交给《地球物理学评论》，一份科学杂志，汉森今天在一封e - mail中说到。
The document will be submitted to Reviews of Geophysics, a scientific journal, Hansen said today in ane-mail.
他们的研究将全世界的评论都聚集在了材料科学、计算机应用、凝聚态物理学上。
Their research has opened up a world of insights into materials science, computer applications and condensed matter physics.
但其也更意想不到的显示了出版物最多引用包括物理评论快报和天体物理学日报。
But it also shows, more unexpectedly, that the publications most heavily cited include the physical Review Letters and Astrophysical Journal.
Sambaran博士评论道：“物理学家们已经花了半个多世纪的时间寻找引力波，至今，他们只是证明了引力波的捕捉非常困难。”
Sambaran comments, "Physicists have looked for gravitational waves for more than half a century." But up to now they have proved elusive.
第二种形式，神秘的思想方式和东方哲学越来越时髦；有些评论家说，这种时髦对基础物理学的触及，深刻而富有意义。
Second, a growing fashion for mystical thinking and Eastern philosophy, which some commentators have claimed makes deep and meaningful contact with fundamental physics.
但是，也有评论家担心这个大型强子对撞机会超出物理学家的大胆预测：它会不会产生能够吞噬地球的黑洞呢？
But some critics fear the LHC could exceed physicists' wildest conjectures: Will it spawn a black hole that could swallow Earth?
所有评论者的语言都很惊人，他们一个个好像比耶鲁大学的天体物理学家更懂宇宙和物理。
Amazing how all the commenters seem to know more about the universe and physics than a Yale astrophysicist...
看起来我们有来自谷歌大学的顶级核物理学家在做评论。
PanteraX9 Looks like we have some top notch nuclear physicists from the University of Google commenting here.
看起来我们有来自谷歌大学的顶级核物理学家在做评论。
PanteraX9 Looks like we have some top notch nuclear physicists from the University of Google commenting here.
应用推荐