科学家们是如何探测到一种很少与其他物质相互起作用的粒子的呢？
How can scientists detect a particle that interacts so infrequently with other matter?
可是他们做了什么呢他们给你一些非常差劲的原始数据然后直奔稀释一万亿倍的实验而去然后声称他们观测到了同样的信号。
But no. They show off some very poor raw data and then rush off to dilute the experiment a trillion fold and claim to see the same signal.
这是开始，没错；但当你还没有看到结果如何的时候，你怎么能确切地知道，即使是猜测到，结果呢？
These are the beginnings, yes; but how do you know for sure when you don't know the end, and how do you know, or even surmise, the end?
优雅的退出当你在函数中检测到一个错误或者无效状态时，最好的处理方式是什么呢？ 返回一个错误代号(error code),抛出一个异常还是调用assert()？
When you detect an error or invalid state in a function, what's the best way to handle it?
如果程序足够聪明，能够监测到差异，为什么它自身不能改正错误呢？
If the application is smart enough to detect the difference, why can't it correct the problem itself?
我们不禁会问自己：如果我们能有办法预测到曼哈顿下城基础设施的恢复能力，而不像城市与水之间的墙一样，我们会做些什么呢？
We asked ourselves: What if we could envision the resilience infrastructure for Lower Manhattan in a way that wouldn't be like a wall between the city and the water?
比如，谁能预测到上周美国人会在三天内花费七千万美元看《300》呢?这部影片是关于一位操苏格兰口音的斯巴达克战士的故事，影评反映很差。
Who could have predicted, for example, that Americans would spend some $70m in just three days last week to see "300", a poorly reviewed film featuring a Scottish-accented Spartan warrior?
所有的世界杯比赛，只有一个冠军，那么就让时间来证明，这场比赛的预测到底谁会赢，章鱼还是鹦鹉呢。
As always in the World Cup, there can only be one winner and only time will tell whether this time round it's the octopus or the parakeet.
所有的世界杯比赛，只有一个冠军，那么就让时间来证明，这场比赛的预测到底谁会赢，章鱼还是鹦鹉呢。
As always in the World Cup, there can only be one winner and only time will tell whether this time round it's the octopus or the parakeet.
应用推荐