我国现行的民事非法证据认定标准存在范围宽泛、可操作性较差的缺陷。
The identification standard of civil illegal evidence in our country present existence some flaws such as the scope is broad, the operational is bad.
因此，如何完善或重新建构一套明确而合理的民事非法证据认定标准，已成为学术界研究的重点。
Therefore, how consummates or resets clear and reasonable identification standard of civil illegal evidence has become the key point in the academic circles studies.
因此，本文试图从法院视角和当事人视角来对我国的民事诉讼非法证据排除规则展开探讨，这便是本文第四和第五部分的内容。
Therefore, this article attempts to view the courts and parties perspective on China's rule of excluding illegally obtained evidence in civil proceedings commenced to explore.
因此，如何完善民事诉讼非法证据排除规则，就成了法学理论研究者的重要任务。
Therefore, how to improve the rules of civil procedure to exclude illegally obtained evidence, it becomes an important task of legal theory researchers.
事实上，民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的完善，具有绝对的必要性和重大的意义。
In fact, the founding and maturity of the Rules of Civil Procedure illegal evidence exclusion has the absolute necessity and important meaning.
在民事诉讼中要明确证据的合法性，让非法证据排除原则得以充分的发挥作用。
Since lawful evidence collection is an important matter, we should make the validity of evidence clear, to let the principle of unlawful evidence exclusion should give full play in civil action.
令人遗憾的是，至今我国民事诉讼理论界，都没有对非法证据排除问题作系统的研究。
Unfortunately, so far the theory of China's civil sector, are not the problem of illegal evidence exclusion for systematic study.
令人遗憾的是，至今我国民事诉讼理论界，都没有对非法证据排除问题作系统的研究。
Unfortunately, so far the theory of China's civil sector, are not the problem of illegal evidence exclusion for systematic study.
应用推荐