确定管辖是民事诉讼的第一环节，其制度完善与否很大程度上影响着当事人实体权利的实现。
Affirming jurisdiction is the first step of civil litigation, its system's perfection is greatly effect the realization of parties' substantive right.
在民事诉讼中，缺席审判制度是指在一方当事人缺席的情况下，法院依法对案件进行审理并做出判决的制度。
In civil litigation, trial by default institution should be prescribed as a legal institution with which the court hear and adjudge a case when one party defaults.
基于此点考虑，探讨将“当事人诉讼”引入我国的诉讼制度，以解决民事行政关联纠纷的诉讼瓶颈。
Therefore, this paper tries to introduce action of parties into Chinas lawsuit system in order to solve the knotty problems caused by the disputes.
1991年颁布施行的民事诉讼法建立了我国以当事人自行收集证据为主、法院调查取证为辅的证据收集制度。
The Law of Civil Procedure issued in 1991 put the litigant's investigating evidence first and the court's investigating evidence secondary in our system of collecting proof.
民事诉讼程序中回避制度的适用对象因受到当事人知情权和被申请主体资格等限制，在实践中无法得到有效的实现。
The applicable object of the withdrawal system can not be effectively implemented because of the limit of the right to know and the qualification of subject in the civil procedures.
自愿、公平、合法、平等地进行调解并充分尊重当事人的诉讼权利是实施民事调解制度的重要原则。
It's an important principle of implementing the civil mediation system that the system goes on fairly, legally, equally and giving fully respect to the lawsuit right of the concerned parties.
我国民事诉讼法中设置财产保全程序制度，是为了确保当事人的合法权益，保证权利人的权利能得到有效的实现。
Establishing the system of attachment in the code of civil procedures in our country for the sake of insuring the legal right, guaranteeing the persons right can be got effectively and substantially.
当前我国民事诉讼当事人调查取证权存在的最突出问题是权利的行使缺乏相应的制度保障。
The most prominent problem concerning the right to investigate and obtain evidences of civil litigants now is the lack of systematic safeguard for the exertion of the right.
本文正是以此为视角，展开对民事诉讼当事人取证制度的研究。
Just by this visual Angle, research on the system of evidences collection by civil litigants is carried out.
证券民事诉讼制度存在系统性偏袒，集团诉讼、团体诉讼、选定当事人模式等各不相同。
The systemic bias prevents the dispersed investors from exercising their litigation rights in both single and joint actions.
我国当事人陈述制度根植于客观真实证明标准和职权主义诉讼模式，缺失阐明案情的功能并且证明事实的功能极弱。随着我国民事诉讼模式的转换，重构当事人陈述制度势在必行。
The party's statement system of our country, which has only a weak function of proving fact, is rooted in the objective identification standard and the authority principle lawsuit pattern.
通过对当事人诉讼权利的法理分析和体系建构，可以为民事诉讼法的修改和具体程序制度的完善提供理论指导和相应的建议。
Through theoretical analysis and systematic construction of litigious rights, we can provide jurisprudential guidance and specific recommendations for revising and perfecting civil procedure.
当事人程序主体性原则，所要阐明的是民事诉讼制度“为谁而存在”的问题。
The principle of the parties as the subject in the civil procedure is about the issue that for whom the law of civil procedure should be.
因此对民事诉讼当事人取证制度进行研究具有理论意义和现实意义。
So it is of practical significance to do some research on the system of evidences collection by civil litigants.
因此对民事诉讼当事人取证制度进行研究具有理论意义和现实意义。
So it is of practical significance to do some research on the system of evidences collection by civil litigants.
应用推荐