他清楚地体认到，关于其武装先知标准的，例外情事。
He clearly recognizes that there are clear exceptions to his rule about armed prophets.
马奇亚·维利的武装先知，不只是一位歹徒，一如，Orson, Welles，之属。
Machiavelli's armed prophet is more than just a gangster, like Orson Welles in that part.
难道他没说过武装的先知总能取胜而，徒手的先知总是失败？，难道他没说过，他写作是为了揭示出事物的本来面目，证明事物并非人们幻想的那个样子？
Does he not say that armed prophets always win, the unarmed prophets lose? Did he not say that he wrote to reveal the effectual truth of things and? Not just what people have imagined the case to be?
也就在这个论点上，马奇亚·维利推出他的著名区别定义，介于武装与非武先知之间。
And it is here that Machiavelli introduces his famous distinction between armed and unarmed prophets.
难道他没说过武装的先知总能取胜而，徒手的先知总是失败？
Does he not say that armed prophets always win, the unarmed prophets lose?
的确，有些带著武器的先知仍然失败了；但是，所有没有武装的先知都被摧毁了。
It is true that some armed prophets still failed, but all unarmed prophets have been destroyed.
的确，有些带著武器的先知仍然失败了；但是，所有没有武装的先知都被摧毁了。
It is true that some armed prophets still failed, but all unarmed prophets have been destroyed.
应用推荐