目的：分析桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影的益处。
Objective: To evaluate the advantages of transradial artery coronary angiography.
目的比较经尺动脉途径和经桡动脉途径介入治疗的可行性。
Objective the purpose of this study was to compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TUA with TRA intervention.
目的比较经尺动脉途径和经桡动脉途径介入治疗的可行性。
Objective Transradial approach is accepted as an alternative for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
目的探讨经桡动脉途径行冠脉介入治疗的临床疗效及安全性。
Objective: To evaluate results and safety of coronary intervention therapy through radial artery.
目的探讨经桡动脉途径冠状动脉介入术后穿刺口的最佳包扎止血方法。
Objective To explore the best method of bandaging and hemostasis for puncture point after coronary intervention by radial artery path.
结果 经桡动脉途径31例（79.5%），经股动脉途径8例（20.5%）。
Results The access was radial artery in 31(79.5%) and femoral artery in 8(20.5%) patients.
结论桡动脉径路行冠状动脉造影具有止血容易，患者卧床时间短和并发症少的优点，是一种安全、有效的介入途径。
Conclusion Radial approach has its advantages of easy hemostasis, short stay in bed and few complications. It is a safe and effective approach for...
结论桡动脉径路行冠状动脉造影具有止血容易，患者卧床时间短和并发症少的优点，是一种安全、有效的介入途径。
Conclusion Radial approach has its advantages of easy hemostasis, short stay in bed and few complications. It is a safe and effective approach for...
应用推荐