第三部分分析了我国案外人异议之诉制度的现状。
The third part analyzes the current situations of the outer party dissidence.
第三章案外人申请再审制度构建之理论基础与现实需求。
Chapter Three — the Theoretical Foundation and Practical need of the Third Party's Applying for Retrial System.
本文共分为四个部分：第一部分案外人异议之诉制度概述。
The article is made up of four parts. The first part is the overview of outer party dissidence.
第二部分考察了一些主要国家和地区对案外人异议之诉制度的规定。
The second part is mainly about the regulations on outer party dissidence of the important countries.
最后，论述了案外人异议之诉的特征，指出其是与执行程序密切联系的实体救济。
At last, the article discusses the characteristics of the dissidence and points it is a relief entities closely connected to the execution procedure.
综上所述，得出结论，应从事中和事后两个方面对案外人在诈害诉讼中的权利进行救济。
To sum up, the conclusion should be engaged in and after a person who is not involved in the case at two aspects of the fraud victims rights litigation relief.
本章主要对案外人申请再审制度进行了法律定性，然后在对该制度缺陷分析的基础上提出了完善构想。
This chapter mainly covers the legalities of the third party's applying for retrial system, and then put up the improving ideas after the analysis of the system's deficiencies.
第四条法官应当抵制当事人及其代理人、辩护人或者案外人利用各种社会关系的说情，并按照有关规定处理。
A judge should resist the influence from the parties, attorney, defendants and other people or through their social contacts and should handle the situation according to relevant regulations.
第四条法官应当抵制当事人及其代理人、辩护人或者案外人利用各种社会关系的说情，并按照有关规定处理。
A judge should resist the influence from the parties, attorney, defendants and other people or through their social contacts and should handle the situation according to relevant regulations.
应用推荐