地球未来基金会的“海上无盗”项目组的报告称因海盗行为造成的各项费用正在激增。
The One Earth Future Foundation’s Oceans Beyond Piracy project documents exploding costs in piracy-related actions (.pdf).
无因管理是法定的发生债的原因，这使本身是一种侵权的行为变成了一种法律允许的行为。
Because management is no legal reason for the occurrence of debt, which makes an infringement in itself becomes a behavior allowed by law.
本文将从无因管理立法的目的出发，寻求找到一个合理的无因管理判断标准以及无因管理行为的补偿标准。
This paper will not proceed due to the management purpose of the legislation and seek to find a reasonable non-management criteria, and no compensation for management behavior.
要是少了其中的某些构成要件但管理行为确实为本人带来利益是否可以构成无因管理？
If less, some of which constitute the elements but the management does to benefit himself can constitute a non-management?
结合我国现行立法之规范，如果确立物权行为无因性理论，则对已有立法将带来彻底改变，不利于立法的延续性和统一性。
Considering the existing laws, if the Abstract Nature Theory has been established, they would be altered thoroughly and it would go against the continuance and unification of legislation.
在性质上，无因管理是一种事实行为。
In nature, not because of the fact that management is a behavior.
票据行为的无因性不同于一般法律行为，具有自己的独特之处。
As an abstract act, act on commercial instrument is different from other legal ACTS.
意定代理中授权行为的独立性是一个被前人发现的客观事实，授权行为的独立性问题是探讨授权内无因性的前提。
The independence of the act of authorization in the voluntary agency is an objective fact, and it is the premise to probe the non-causative nature within the act of authorization.
不能以善意取得制度否定物权行为的无因性。
We should not deny the abstract nature of juristic ACTS of real rights due to the bona fide gain system.
善意取得制度和物权行为的无因性具有本质的一致性，功能也是互补的。
The bona fide gain system and the abstract nature of juristic ACTS of real rights are essentially consistent and functionally complementary.
作为债的发生依据的法律事实，无因管理属于合法的事实行为。
As the juristic fact of the emergence basis of the debt, voluntary service belongs to the legal fact behavior.
而物权行为无因性的相对化则是物权行为理论合理化的必然选择。
To rationalize the theory of the juristic acts of real rights, the inevitably choice is to make unreason principle relativistic.
在保护交易安全上，物权行为的无因性原则与善意取得制度已成为学者们争议的焦点之一。
Because in the protection transaction security, the real right behavior non-the natural principle and the good intentions obtain the system to become one which of focal points the scholars disputed.
德国法学家萨维尼在对罗马法言解读的基础上创立的物权行为及其无因性是物权法领域的最富争议同时又是最富注意力的理论之一。
Founded by Germany jurisprudential scholar Savigny, the theory of jus in rem action is one of the most attracting and most dispute-evoking theory in the real law.
物权行为以其独立性和无因性为支柱。
The juristic ACTS of real rights are based on unreason principle and independence principle.
无因性的存在，使物权行为理论的价值受到挑战。
The existence of unreason principle makes the value of the theory of the juristic ACTS of real rights be challenged.
从物权行为理论在理论上的错误、无因性原则的弊端、其对现实法律生活的不利影响及我国民法对其否定的态度等方面，可以看到物权行为理论已无存在的必要。
It has many shortcomings, such as theoretical faultiness, the defect of abstract nature, disadvantages to the reality of laws life and negative attitude in the civil law, etc.
我国现阶段的票据行为无因性立法仍然存在诸多不足，在现实生活中也造成了很多不良影响，构建与完善我国票据行为的无因性制度可谓任重道远。
There still exist deficiencies in non-causa in bill conduct at the present stage andother evil influences in practical life. We have long way to go to construct and perfectnon-causa in bill conduct.
在现代民法中，物权行为无因性原则已经失去了它的历史基础和法律基础，应当退出历史舞台。
In modern civil law, the doctrine of Abstraktionsprinzip has lost its historical and legal foundation it used to have, and should quit the historical arena.
物权行为无因性理论以承认物权行为的理论为前提，是关于物权行为与债权行为关系的理论。
Real rights and to recognize the property rights theory premised on the theory of conduct, behavior and claims about the behavior of property relations theory.
因此本文主张我国应在法律上明确确立票据行为的无因性原则，这主要是基于票据行为无因性原则本身的价值、意义；
It is proposed that China should establish definite non-cause in bill conduct principle based on the value and significance of non-cause in bill conduct ;
违背前项规定之支出，应依民法无因管理或侵权行为之规定请求返还。
Disbursement in violation of the preceding Paragraph shall be restituted in accordance with the provisions provided for in the Civil Code for management of affairs without mandate or torts.
违背前项规定之支出，应依民法无因管理或侵权行为之规定请求返还。
Disbursement in violation of the preceding Paragraph shall be restituted in accordance with the provisions provided for in the Civil Code for management of affairs without mandate or torts.
应用推荐