第三部分是侵占罪中的拒不退还或拒不交出问题。
最后阐述了“拒不退还或拒不交出”是我国侵占罪的必备构成要件。
Lastly, it points out that "refusing to return or hand over" is a necessary constitutive element of the crime of misappropriation.
侵占罪中拒不退还与拒不交出在本质上并没有什么不同，不过是表述上的不同而已。
The terms "refusing to return" and "refusing to hand over" in crime of encroachment are basic the same in essence excepting the expressive ways.
本文将从侵占罪的对象、非法占为已有、拒不退还以及相关问题四个部分进行系统、全面地论述。
This thesis paper will have a systematic and overall discussion on four parts: the object of the crime of seizure, the illegal seizure, the resistance to return, and the relevant problems.
应将其“告诉才处理”的范围限定在“将保管的他人财物非法占为已有，数额较大，拒不退还的”。
The scope should be limited in that "illegal custody of the property of others for their own, larger amounts, refusing to return to."
应将其“告诉才处理”的范围限定在“将保管的他人财物非法占为已有，数额较大，拒不退还的”。
The scope should be limited in that "illegal custody of the property of others for their own, larger amounts, refusing to return to."
应用推荐