执行手工的代码复查和检查是一种在代码中确定问题的很有效的方式。
Performing manual code reviews and inspections can be a highly effective way of identifying defects in code.
它的基础是工件的开发、复查和使用不能由同一人执行，且可以质疑流程的公平性。
Its foundation is that development, review, approval, and use of artifacts cannot be carried out by the same individuals, as otherwise the impartiality of the process can be called into question.
自动化的代码复查工具有若干种向软件开发处理过程添加值的方式，这是由于它们执行以下这些任务
The automated code review tool adds value to the software development process in several ways, because it performs these tasks
然而，这种效力往往受到时间约束条件的限制，导致以下这种情况的出现：代码复查和检查或者是不被执行，或者是很少被执行。
However, the effectiveness is often limited because of time constraints, leading to a situation where code reviews and inspections are either not conducted or are conducted infrequently.
我们与项目团队合作，在九个月的周期内执行了多次体系结构复查，并开始建立“卓越中心”方法的基础。
Working with the project team, we conducted multiple architectural reviews over a nine month period, and began to establish the underpinnings of a Center of Excellence approach.
基于个体缺陷数据的检查表RUP角色不执行基于个人缺陷数据的复查。
Checklists based on personal defect data. The workers in the RUP do not perform reviews based on personal defect data.
基于个体缺陷数据的检查表RUP角色不执行基于个人缺陷数据的复查。
Checklists based on personal defect data. The workers in the RUP do not perform reviews based on personal defect data.
应用推荐