结果治疗前、治疗后患者生活质量评分均与肺功能分级成正相关，治疗前后分值的变化与肺功能分级无相关性。
Result The score of life quality was correlated to the fractionation of lung function before and after the treatment.
研究结论：腰背痛学校的干预程序可提高女性慢性下腰痛患者的生活质量评分。
Conclusion. The back school program might improve the quality of life score in women with chronic low back pain.
因此，只有以患者为基础的评分才能评价患者术后与健康相关生活质量的满意度。
Thus, only patient-based measures can be used to assess patient's satisfaction with health-related quality of life postoperatively.
结论汉中地区部分农村脑卒中患者总体评分较低，生活质量较差。
Conclusions The scores of quality of life among stroke patients in Hanzhong rural population were low.
方法分析71例COPD患者治疗前后生活质量评分与肺功能分级的相关性。
Method To analyze the correlation between life quality score and fractionation of lung function in 71 patients with COPD before and after the treatment.
然而，治疗组患者的初始生活质量评分是3.5分，在增加了调味料之后，平均分升到了8分。
However, the treatment group had an initial quality of life score of 3.5, rising to an average of 8 after the addition of flavoring.
控制组患者的初始“生活质量”评分是2.5分(满分是10分)，在制定传统方法来改善味道后，分数升为3.8分。
Patients in the control group had an initial 'quality of life' score of 2.5 (out of 10), with the score improving to 3.8 after instituting conventional methods to improve palatability.
以化疗前、化疗6个周期后KPS评分和体质量变化及患者生活质量评估表测试来综合评价患者的生活质量。
The QOL of patients was evaluated according to the evaluation sheet about KPS score and the change of body mass as well as QOL scale of patients before chemotherapy and at the 6th cycles.
结论：高压氧治疗方法可以改善颅脑创伤患者的GCS评分，提高治疗疗效，对提高患者的生活质量有着很重要的作用。
Conclusion: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy can improve the GCS score, curative efficacy and the quality of life for patients with traumatic brain injury.
两组患者神经功能缺损评分、日常生活能力量表评分均有不同程度的改善，而治疗组痰湿体质评分、生活质量及日常生活能力量表评分改善程度较对照组明显，两组比较有显著差异（P＜0.05）。
The Qil scores and ADL scores in each groups rised had a significant difference(P<0.05), the process of scores in the treated group were obviously superior to that in the control group.
两组患者神经功能缺损评分、日常生活能力量表评分均有不同程度的改善，而治疗组痰湿体质评分、生活质量及日常生活能力量表评分改善程度较对照组明显，两组比较有显著差异（P＜0.05）。
The Qil scores and ADL scores in each groups rised had a significant difference(P<0.05), the process of scores in the treated group were obviously superior to that in the control group.
应用推荐