这是莱布尼茨观点,回答是,这是语言问题而非形而上问题,可以用尼采回答。
This is meant to be an argument to Litmitz's Law but the reply to that is this is language not metaphysics and I think can answer that with Nietzsche.
换句话说，通过语言进行推论，无法逃离形而上学的方式，尼采认为形而上学论主要依靠于语言。
In other words reasoning in language does not seem able to avoid all these practices in which Metaphysics which for Nietzsche is essentially language Metaphysics relies.
海德格尔后期的语言观超越了形而上学语言观，在某种意义上开启了后现代这一维度。
The language outlook of Hei- dergel's later stage has transcended metaphysic language outlook, thus in a sense starts the thought of later modern times.
通过形式上的颠倒，拉康对索绪尔的二元论进行了批判，并且指出，二元论并非语言结构分析的结果，而是来自传统形而上学思想。
By the formal inversion, Lacan criticized Saussure's dualism, and indicated that his dualism is not the result of the analysis of structure, but from the traditional metaphysical thoughts.
因此，传统形而上学在本质上是对主语的信仰，是一种语言形而上学。
Thus, essentially the traditional metaphysics was subject in full relief and a kind of metaphysics of language.
形而上学，可以说，就是语言形而上学。
指称问题是当代英美语言哲学中的核心问题之一，也是与形而上学有着最为直接关系的部分。
The problem of reference has been one of the central in contemporary Anglo-American philosophy of language. It is also involved directly in metaphysics.
语言是形而上学的根源，又是形而上学的归宿。
Language is the root of metaphysics and the permanent home for metaphysics as well.
我们将从柏拉图“理式”这一概念谈起，“理式”决定了口头语言高于书写文字的传统（译者注：即德里达所谓的“逻各斯中心主义”），并奠定了西方形而上学的传统。
We will start with the Platonic idea of logos that assigns speech a superior position over writing and defines the tradition of western metaphysics of language.
我不知道者从语言学上来说对不对，我也不懂从形而上学角度看，有什么问题。
I don't know the philology side, I don't know what disables to metaphysical questions.
从语言逻辑分析到语言语义分析是卡尔纳普拒斥形而上学的策略转变。
From logical analysis to semantic analysis of language is the tactical change of Carnap's rejecting metaphysics.
如同在《逻辑哲学论》中被形式语言消解一样，形而上学在《哲学研究》中被日常语言所消解。
Metaphysics is exiled by formal language in Tractates Logicophilosophicus as by normal language in Philosophical Investigations.
如同在《逻辑哲学论》中被形式语言消解一样，形而上学在《哲学研究》中被日常语言所消解。
Metaphysics is exiled by formal language in Tractates Logicophilosophicus as by normal language in Philosophical Investigations.
应用推荐