法院调解制度的正当性基础是当事人本位而非当事人主义。
The legitimate rationale of court's mediation is party-oriented, not the adversary system.
上述原则在诉讼程序中相应转化为职权主义和当事人主义之间的平衡。
The principle to this part has changed into the balance between the rights of parties and the power of the court.
职权主义和当事人主义两大行政审判模式走向互相融合已成为大势所趋。
The two administrative adjudication models of term and party no longer hold line and it has become a general trend towards mutual integration.
当事人主义与职权主义两大诉讼模式的较量与交融为这一趋势提供了重要的参考视角；
The conflict and combination of the litigant-centered principle and power-centered principle, two major suit patterns, provide an essential referential perspective for this trend.
在奉行当事人主义的英美法系国家中，法官需要在听取控辩双方充分辩论的基础上作出判决。
In common law countries with adversarial systems, the judge basis his or her ruling on the arguments of the prosecutor and defense lawyer.
当事人主义和职权主义作为正义程序的两种模式，分别蕴涵了两种“中心主义”理念和“二元对立”等级。
Adversary system and doctrine of function and power as two models of righteous procedure contain respectively the concept of "centralism" and the rank of "binary opposites".
第二部分是对我国民事诉讼存在的不足进行了深入剖析，论述了诉之利益对当事人主义诉讼模式建立的推动作用。
Part II: the existing problems in China's civil action are analyzed and the role of interest of litigation in promoting the establishment of party doctrine litigant mode is discussed.
作为美国刑事诉讼中颇具特色的一部分，辩诉交易制度生存于当事人主义的诉讼价值理念与诉讼构造中，有其合理的内核。
As a featured part of its criminal procedure, American plea bargaining system has a reasonable core base for existence because of its important value in the lawsuit procedure of adversary system.
在当事人主义诉讼模式下，当事人乃为民事诉讼之程序主体，享有辩论权和处分权，其行使权利的途径主要须经由一定的诉讼行为。
In the adversary litigation pattern, the parties are the subject of civil procedure, who are entitled to argue and dispose of their own benefit through some suit actions.
在全球职权主义和当事人主义两大行政审判模式融合的大背景下，我国现行的强职权主义行政审判模式日益显示出其与生俱来的弊病而不宜继续沿用。
In this background, the current administrative trial mode in China, so-called strong authority principle, is revealing its born weakness day by day, thereby it is unfavorable to continue.
但我国的学者对法官释明权制度与当事人主义诉讼模式间的紧密关系却缺乏充分的认识，生怕一强调法官的职权就又回到了旧有的职权主义诉讼模式中去。
But scholars in our country actually lack the full understanding of close relations of the system of judge's interpretation right and the litigant model lawsuit pattern.
但我国的学者对法官释明权制度与当事人主义诉讼模式间的紧密关系却缺乏充分的认识，生怕一强调法官的职权就又回到了旧有的职权主义诉讼模式中去。
But scholars in our country actually lack the full understanding of close relations of the system of judge's interpretation right and the litigant model lawsuit pattern.
应用推荐