行政诉讼客观证明责任的分配是诉讼法上的永恒话题。
The distribution of Objective Burden of Proof is a lasting theme disputed in Administrative Procedural Law.
本文着重探讨了民事诉讼中当事人负担客观证明责任的缘由。
The thesis focuses itself on the essential cause of burden of proof by the party concerned in civil proceedings.
传统的证明责任分配问题向来侧重于客观证明责任对要件事实真伪不明的处理。
The traditional allocation of the burden of proof has always been focused on the objective burden of proof on the elements of dealing with the fact that authenticity is unknown.
客观证明责任应为实体法的有机组成部分，实体法的具体规范都应内含证明责任的规定。
The objective proof responsibility should be an organic composition part of the substantive law, whose concrete standard should contain the proof responsibility stipulation.
英美法系的提出证据责任、说服责任和大陆法系的主观证明责任、客观证明责任，严格来说，存在区别不能简单等同。
Burden of producing evidence and burden of persuasion in the Anglo-American law system and subjective burden and objective burden are different, strictly speaking.
从程序角度看，证明标准是证明主体的证明任务是否完成及其证明责任是否及时卸除的客观标志。
From the view of procedure law, proof standard is the mark that whether the onus probandi (burden of proof) on the subject is ended.
因此，文章所说的举证责任转移仅指主观的证明责任，客观的证明责任是不会发生转移的。
As a result, the article said only transfer the burden of proof to prove the responsibility of subjective and objective burden of proof is no transfer.
因此，文章所说的举证责任转移仅指主观的证明责任，客观的证明责任是不会发生转移的。
As a result, the article said only transfer the burden of proof to prove the responsibility of subjective and objective burden of proof is no transfer.
应用推荐