并在此基础上，构建我国开放式基金绩效评价体系。
Above all, conceive the system for open-end fund performance appraisal.
那么，是否可以避开这两个假定建立一套基金绩效评价方法?。
So, can we build a new framework of performance evaluation without these two assumptions.
这些情况表明，众多的基金投资者缺乏对于基金绩效评价的认识。
These cases show that many investors lack the knowledge of open-fund performance evaluation.
基金绩效评价是基金研究的基础性问题，是以现代投资理论为基础的。
The performance evaluation is the basic question of the study on mutual funds, which based on the modern investment theory.
本文在评述国外基金评价方法的基础上，结合我国的实际情况，建立了一套我国股票型基金绩效评价系统。
This paper constructs a equity fund performance evaluation system according to domestic practice by reviewing foreign evaluation methods.
最后，针对实证研究结果，提出提高我国基金绩效评价的策略，并从监管部门、基金管理公司、基金经理人和投资者角度提出建议。
At last, based on the empirical research result, labels the strategy about how to advance the fund performance appraisal in China, and makes the Suggestions for fund supervisor, manager and investor.
另外，国内研究人员采用的评价方法仍然局限在传统的基金绩效评价指标，这些方法在我国的适用性一直受到理论界和实务界的质疑。
However, the research is still backward. More importantly, the evaluation methods adopted are limited in the range of traditional indexes, and the applicability always meets doubts in China.
同时通过本文客观的绩效评价，以满足投资者、基金公司、监管层等各方面的不同需求。
Simultaneously, the empirical research in this paper would satisfy the different demands of investors, fund companies and supervision staffs.
同时通过本文客观的绩效评价，以满足投资者、基金公司、监管层等各方面的不同需求。
Simultaneously, the empirical research in this paper would satisfy the different demands of investors, fund companies and supervision staffs.
应用推荐