对于案件的细节，双方各执一词，这里是一些基本的情况。
Both sides dispute the details of the case, but here are the basics.
作为回应，F.D.A推迟了检测计划，现在双方为抗生素会造成多大的危险，什么才是确保供应的牛奶中没有药物污染的上佳之策各执一词。
In response, the F.D.A. postponed the testing, and now the two sides are sparring over how much danger the antibiotics pose and the best way to ensure that the drugs do not end up in the milk supply.
不过在这种两方各执一词，证据也只是双方证词的情况下，如何解决纠纷？
But how can you possibly solve a case like this, where the only evidence comes from two conflicting viewpoints?
不过在这种两方各执一词，证据也只是双方证词的情况下，如何解决纠纷？
But how can you possibly solve a case like this, where the only evidence comes from two conflicting viewpoints?
应用推荐