目的:对比直接冠状动脉介入术(PCI)及静脉尿激酶(UK)溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死(ami)的疗效。
Objective: To compare the effect of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) and urokinase (UK) thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(ami)患者静脉溶栓失败后延迟及补救性冠状动脉支架置入术对血清c -反应蛋白(crp)的影响。
Aim: To observe the effect of rescue percutaneous coronary stent on serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
方法50例急性心肌梗死患者经静脉溶栓后行冠状动脉造影显示TIMI血流3级。
Methods 50 patients with acute myocardial infarction showed TIMI 3 coronary blood flow after intravenous thrombolysis.
目的分析经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效并进行比较。
To compare the clinical effects between PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) and thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.
目的分析经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效并进行比较。
To compare the clinical effects between PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) and thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.
应用推荐