四是确定共同危险行为人的责任承担。
Joint dangerous act tortfeasors should bear the joint and several liability.
共同危险行为是数人侵权的一个重要类型。
Joint dangerous activity is an important type characterized by a tort committed by several infringers.
共同危险行为是共同侵权行为的形态之一。
共同危险行为是广义共同侵权行为的一个重要形态。
The joint dangerous act is an important pattern of the general joint tort.
共同危险行为在因果关系上是必然性和法律推定相结合。
Its causality is a combination of certainty and legal presumption.
结语部分重申了我国民法确立共同危险行为制度的重大意义。
The postscript summary reasserts the significance of establishing the joint dangerous act system.
共同危险行为制度从传统的一般侵权领域延伸到了特殊侵权领域。
The existence of joint dangerous act extends from general tort field to special tort field.
共同危险行为人能够证明损害后果不是由其行为造成的，不承担赔偿责任。
Where anyone who is suspected to have caused the joint danger can prove that the injury consequence is not caused from his act, he shall bear no compensation liabilities.
共同危险行为人承担连带责任的基础不再是共同过失，而是客观危险的可责难性。
The foundation of bearing joint and several liability by possible tortfeasors is no longer joint-negligence but the blameworthiness of subjective danger.
高空抛坠物侵权责任不同于建筑物或者其他设施致人损害侵权责任，也不同于共同危险行为。
Tort liability of the high toss act, is different from common dangerous act, and also different from that of building or other facilities.
共同危险行为的主体和主观构成要素的界定对于避免加害人范围的不当扩张具有重要的意义。
It is significant for avoiding expanding victims scope inappropriately to define the subject of joint dangerous act.
共同危险行为的主体和主观构成要素的界定对于避免加害人范围的不当扩张具有重要的意义。
Whether the subjective requisite of dangerous act should be the element of defining the joint dangerous act is decided by the types of tort.
因而，本文拟对共同危险行为停止系统化剖析，希望可以对我国共同危险行为制度的完善有所协助。
Therefore, this article intends to conduct a systematic analysis of common risk in the hope of our common risk behaviors help improve the system.
在日常生活中存在着数人侵权使他人受损但又无法查明实际损害人的情形，此类行为被称为共同危险行为。
In daily life there are several people infringing so that others can not identify the actual damage but the case against the person, such behavior is known as a common risk behaviors.
然后分别对不同类型的共同侵权行为即共同加害行为、共同危险行为、合伙致人损害行为的构成要件进行了分析。
And then, to analyze the constituent element of different types joint act of tort as common injury act and common dangerous act and injuring others in partnership.
楼上落下物致人损害不能确认加害人，并不构成共同危险行为，也不能适用公平责任，只能对受害人实行社会救济。
When the damage to people is caused by fallen objects with an unidentified injuring person, it doesn t constitute joint dangerous act and the equitable liability doctrine can not be applied either.
但是，共同危险行为制度相关的理论研究还不够深入和系统，司法实践中仍不能准确认定共同危险行为人的民事责任。
But the relevant theoretical research isn't systematic and deep enough, we still can't determine the actor's civil liability exactly in judicial practice.
但是，共同危险行为制度相关的理论研究还不够深入和系统，司法实践中仍不能准确认定共同危险行为人的民事责任。
But the relevant theoretical research isn't systematic and deep enough, we still can't determine the actor's civil liability exactly in judicial practice.
应用推荐