第二章从中国历史分期中来探讨“古代”和“近代”的表述，呈现清末民国史家通过历史书写来寻求自己民族的历史定位。
The second chapter presents how the historian in the end of Qing Dynasty sought the historical position of his own nationality according to the compilation of history textbook.
宋元变革论、明中期变革论、宋元明过渡论等关于宋代以来中国历史分期的认识，均认为元明两朝之间主要表现为连续而非变革。
Many scholarly discussions have concluded that the nature of the transformation from the Yuan dynasty to the Ming Dynasty is featured by continuity, rather than change.
近十余年来，史学界开始反思并重新认识中国古史分期问题，逐渐认识到五形态的模式并不符合中国历史实际。
The historiography circle began to recognize and retrospect Chinese ancient history stages during the recent ten years and realized that the usual five stages mode didn't accord with Chinese history.
近十余年来，史学界开始反思并重新认识中国古史分期问题，逐渐认识到五形态的模式并不符合中国历史实际。
The historiography circle began to recognize and retrospect Chinese ancient history stages during the recent ten years and realized that the usual five stages mode didn't accord with Chinese history.
应用推荐