服务是在比对象和组件更高层(向业务对齐的方法)的抽象之上的定义。
A service is defined at a level of abstraction that is at a much higher (towards business alignment) level than that of objects and components.
它谈到了SOA最重要的特性，即IT/业务对齐和服务组装等，后者作为SOA架构风格的定义是否更好一些呢？
This gets to the most important SOA features like IT/business alignment, service composition, etc. Would you consider the latter as a better definition of SOA architectural style?
业务服务和IT服务之间的可追溯性通过在软件栈的多个层次提高重用，为企业带来了他们极需的IT和业务对齐。
This traceability between business services and it services brings in the much needed business to it alignment in an enterprise by fostering reuse at multiple levels in a software stack.
然而，SOI也可以被描述或定义成使用ESB的使用，它为与业务对齐的服务解决了访问、路由或转换等方面的问题。
However, SOI could also be described or defined as adoption of an ESB which promotes accessing, routing or transformation for business aligned services.
SOA可定义成一种架构风格，它建议将与业务对齐的企业服务作为设计、构建、组装企业级业务解决方案的基础构件。
SOA can be defined as an architectural style promoting the concept of business-aligned enterprise service as the fundamental unit of designing, building, and composing enterprise business solutions.
在大多数it企业中，企业架构(Enterprise architecture，简称EA)被当作实现合规以及与业务对齐的一种机制。
Enterprise architecture (EA) in most it organizations is viewed as a mechanism to achieve compliance and alignment with business needs.
架构师最重要的职责可能是保证业务和IT的对齐，这就要求特殊的沟通和协调能力。
Perhaps the most important responsibility for the architect is the alignment of business and it and this requires special communication and coordination skills.
企业架构师要使SOA中的业务和IT需求对齐。
The enterprise architect role should align business and it requirements in SOA.
SOA的基础前提是业务活动和软件模块的对齐，这些模块提供了支撑业务活动的具体服务。
SOA is based on the premise of aligning business actions with software modules, the modules providing discrete services in support of the business actions.
EA关注于对齐it系统和业务策略。
EA is concerned with aligning it systems with business strategy.
到头来，SOA的承诺依然是业务和IT的对齐，而如果服务的设计不再参照企业业务模型的分解，实践诺言是不可能的。
At the end of the day, SOA's promise is still to align business and it, which is not possible without designing services based on the decomposition driven by an enterprise business model.
业务架构帮助企业清晰地定义技术要求和功能，并能帮助与业务优先级及目标对齐的IT规划及项目获得成功。
Business architecture helps organizations define the technology requirements and capabilities clearly, yielding it plans and projects that align with business priorities and goals.
PeterHinssen在 “业务/IT的融合：如何超越对齐和转变你企业中的IT”文中[断言]， [...]
Peter Hinssen [asserts] in Business/IT Fusion: How to Move Beyond Alignment and Transform IT in Your Organization, [...
这篇文章中，BobEvans提出IT如果不能采取一种新的方式，不可能为业务和客户带来显著的价值，因为“对齐已到尽头”。
Bob Evans proposes that it cannot bring significant business and customer value without a new approach, because "Alignment Is Dead".
Art Jahnke，在2004年的文章“ 意见陈述——业务-IT的对齐为何如此之难?”
Art Jahnke, in his 2004 article entitled, " Sound Off - Why is Business-IT Alignment So Difficult?
SteveJones：我在这本书中谈到过理解服务的业务价值，云真的做到了，因为它有助于让服务的交付成本更好地与其业务价值对齐。
Steve Jones: in the book I talk about understanding the business value of a service, cloud really plays in to this as it helps to better align the delivery costs of services to their business value.
如果我们把业务架构看作业务流程和业务目标，那么它们的缺失将严重影响业务和IT对齐。
If we look at business architecture as business processes and business goals, then their absence severely compromises business and it alignment.
企业架构(EA)和敏捷方法(AM)拥有共同的目标——交付能够跟业务需要对齐的软件，并响应对这些业务需要无可避免的变更。
Enterprise Architecture (EA) and Agile Methods (am) share the same goal - delivering software that aligns to business needs and responding to the inevitable change of those needs.
SOA的愿景是业务和IT的结合产物，其中业务和IT的对齐由架构师负责推动。
The vision on SOA is a product of business and it, where alignment is facilitated by the architect.
SOA的愿景是业务和IT的结合产物，其中业务和IT的对齐由架构师负责推动。
The vision on SOA is a product of business and it, where alignment is facilitated by the architect.
应用推荐