If you co-own your brand, why would you not put that same energy into your customers?
Would you not eat or drive simply because it will be marginally cheaper tomorrow?
Why would you not look for savings in this very difficult economic climate?
What kind of situation would you not hesitate to put the candidate in?
Question for investors: Why would you not pay a market multiple for a company with stellar earnings, margins, cash flow, share buybacks, aggressively raising dividends, and a high growth rate?
But with millions of people out of work and millions of people losing their homes, how could it not be a referendum on the economy and your handling of it, and why would you not welcome that?
I've been in that situation many times and you trust your team - you trust the integrity and safety of the car, so why would you not trust them when they give you a guideline on what to say?
So there would be things like that, where you thought that there was a pretty clear probability that many more lives would be lost, that you would not do.
As for the veggies, I suppose such forced feeding would indeed be an invasion of personal liberty, but making you pay for them would not, just as making you pay for a gym membership which you can afford but do not use would not.
FORBES: Harvard Law's Fried: A Broccoli Mandate is Constitutional
Why would you say that you would not use the same words as Admiral Mullen?
Second, sharing out a particular task among several machines would be reliable (you would not have all your eggs in one basket) and flexible.
The amount would be paid electronically so you would not need a tiny coin and tiny bank notes.
For example, as Frishberg points out, financial experts would tell you not to try to time the market.
However, you would not know that unless you visit the decked out store in the swanky mall first.
"I would encourage you not to be so certain that there's something sinister going on here, " Williams said then.
But again, I would caution you not to focus solely on that technology.
All of you would not be here unless you -- like me -- were convinced that this danger is real.
And I would encourage you not to over-interpret what Mr. Brennan said.
As for private insurers, I would suggest you not hold your breath waiting for them to raise payments to physician practices in danger.
FORBES: If American Doctors Are Going Broke, Who Is Really Responsible?
And I really would encourage you not to over-read how somebody is sitting as an indication of where the relationship is -- because the relationship, the discussion of the relationship was real.
The Left would rather you not know a basic fact of mortgage lending: The very last thing mortgage companies want is a messy foreclosure that sticks them with distressed properties which they must dispose of at a substantial loss.
FORBES: Too Big To Fail Banks Crumble Before Greedy Federal Government In Mortgage Deal
You would think not, but it shows you at what stage the authorities are in talking to each other.
If it's not profitable, you would not have been here for nine years.
However, sometimes you would not realize this if all you saw were the letters issued by college presidents categorically protesting college rankings.
So all I said was that I think by any fair estimation, I doubt either 9 or 8.9 would be considered something where you would decide not to continue to extend unemployment.
You decided you would not be defined by where you come from but by where you want to go, by what you want to achieve, by the dreams you hope to fulfill.
If there was a Heisman for the most luxurious restaurant in America, and the voters gave the award to The Waffle House, you would not believe it because if you have ever eaten there you have facts to the contrary.
If a tester did show up, you typically would not get a missed test even if you decided not to answer the door.
We haven't had the full statement yet, but initial responses are as you would expect but maybe not as vitriolic as you would expect.
应用推荐