The best ETFs and mutual funds allocate more value to attractive-or-better-rated stocks than the worst, which allocate too much value to neutral-or-worse-rated stocks.
The best ETFs and mutual funds allocate more value to attractive-or-better-rated stocks than the worst ETFs and mutual funds, which allocate too much value to Neutral-or-worse-rated stocks.
It gets my very dangerous rating by allocating over 89% of its value to neutral-or-worse-rated stocks, and to make matters worse, nails investors with total annual costs of 6.49%.
The financial sector has only 21% of its value invested in attractive-or- better-rated stocks while 78% of its value is invested in neutral-or-worse- rated stocks.
The example of Senegal (and, indeed, the strongly worded, morally neutral advertising campaigns conducted in many western countries in the 1980s), shows the value of early action as surely as do Dr Anderson's models.