Justice Kagan and the two justices who joined her concurrence considered a trained drug-detection dog to be a device not in general public use, and on those grounds would have found its use unconstitutional in light of Kyllo.
To test their theory they monitored the daily outdoor routines of two people, one was alone and the other was accompanied by a dog trained to ignore passers-by so it would initiate social contact.
The trained dog reportedly sensed something suspicious about -- or near -- a vehicle parked close to the West Wing, and sat down beside the four-door sedan.