You could call DMM the Janus of tablet builders, as it presents different faces to different audiences.
While most of us have been focused on the Matrix One, DMM was, for a time, running another brand, Pacatek, which was also supposed to be making low-end Android tablets.
Google hasn't yet responded to questions about what happened, although DMM now says the ban was due to complaints about unfulfilled orders.
None of DMM's pages have referenced each other, and the lineups clearly tread on each other's toes.
The promises that shipments will resume contradict what we've learned about DMM's state of affairs.
That's no mean feat when DMM looks to have been founded in 2012 and filed for the Matrix One trademark on June 8th, two weeks before we saw the device ourselves.
We tried getting in touch with Klayman to set the record straight, but this just underscored what looks to be his (and DMM's) rapid retreat from public scrutiny.
With Klayman and DMM so far unable or unwilling to participate, it's difficult to piece together the complete story behind the Matrix One, even after all of our discoveries.
Supposedly, DMM wants to take advantage of "existing manufacturer relationships" in China to offer tablets through the Buyers Club of another company, Direct Media Marketing -- which doesn't appear to exist on the internet, at least as it's described.
应用推荐