-
Table 1 below shows Federal Tax Revenues, Federal Expenditures and the Budget Surplus or Deficit from 1993 (the first year of the Clinton Presidency) to 2011.
FORBES: After Bush Tax Cuts, Payments By Wealthy Actually Increased
-
Indeed, if spending and deficits are the problem, why would a scenario in which our government could no longer spend either in surplus or deficit be so bad?
FORBES: Everything the Hysterics Tell You About Budget Deficits Is Wrong
-
They treat capital expenditures, like buildings and long-term assets, the same way they treat operational expenditures, so it's really impossible to tell if we have a surplus or deficit or what.
CNN: Commentary: I'm just a bill on Capitol Hill
-
To assess how Mr Brown is measuring up to his golden rule, economists have to adjust each year's deficit or surplus according to their reading of the economic cycle.
ECONOMIST: The economy
-
Mr Geithner has suggested deficit or surplus targets of less than 4% of gross domestic product as an alternative to pressing China to allow its currency, the renminbi, to appreciate faster.
WSJ: G-20 to Grill Fed on Bond Purchases
-
That is, no deficit or surplus.
FORBES: These Numbers Don't Figure
-
The primary deficit (or surplus) is what the public accounts look like after you take off all of the interest and debt repayments the government has to make.
FORBES: The Real Greek Solution: Democracy
-
Worrying about a trade deficit, or a trade surplus, is largely useless.
FORBES: Is 95% of the Trade Imbalance Legal Tax Evasion?
-
Back to reality, it must be stressed that applied to our present economic situation, whether government spending is in deficit, balanced, or in surplus is immaterial.
FORBES: Everything the Hysterics Tell You About Budget Deficits Is Wrong