The report says the research indicated that audiences recognised when language was used for "clear purpose or effect" and disliked "unnecessary or gratuitous use".
Petitioner has not offered any unequivocal evidence of legislative purpose which would allow us to override the plain language of section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii) and (C)(ii).
He has also suggested opponents have their heads inserted so far into an unpleasant place that they "think it's a rose garden, " language that an expert witness for Mr. Gerstein said served a business purpose by vividly demonstrating the point.
Given the clarity of the language in question, one can only conclude that these Brotherhood groups are doing so knowingly for the purpose of deceiving the American people.