The move in California is pure political hooliganism--changing rules so they differ from the rest of the nation's for a one-time advantage in what will probably be a close, hotly contested presidential election.
While they may each come to the job with a perspective as to how the Constitution is to be interpreted , can they not step up to their responsibility to insure that we can rest comfortably in the belief that every justice has the pure interests of the law at heart, even if they disagree on their interpretations of the same?