The new version is a lot shorter, and simply repeats what it published in national newspapers this week, stating that the court did not find Samsung to be in breach of Apple's registered design No. 0000181607-0001, reminding us that it was also upheld by the Court of Appeal, providing links to the appropriate patent and judgement documents online.

ENGADGET: Apple posts revised 'Samsung did not copy' statement, acknowledges first version was inaccurate

Corbis first entered into an agreement with Infoflows around 2005, feeding information it gleaned from that relationship to an outside patent counsel, according to court documents.

FORBES

Microsoft ( MSFT - news - people ) for infringing its patent on attaching XML language to Word documents.

FORBES: OutFront

The court documents are part of the ongoing patent fights between Apple and Samsung.

CNN: Heather Kelly,

Mirror Worlds sued Apple in 2008 over claims of patent infringement, specifically with regards to how documents and media were displayed on-screen.

FORBES: Morning Tech Wrap: Facebook, Apple, Nokia

The arguments largely rehashed contentions both sides have made in thousands of documents in this high-profile patent suit, which Apple fired at Samsung in April 2011.

WSJ: Apple, Samsung Point Fingers as Patent Case Begins

The disputed patents include three covering design - including the exterior look of the device - and a 'list scrolling patent' which relates to how users view documents.

BBC: Apple hits Samsung in court again