Adam Looney at the Brookings Institution has a nice new paper on the Bush tax cuts.
FORBES: Obama Giving Rich Big Wet Kiss With Proposal On Bush Tax Cuts
Noting that the Latin American Left is far from monolithic, the paper urges the Bush administration to work with the hemisphere's democratic governments, even anti-American ones like that of Brazil - which has displayed growing unease about the violence and chaos around its perimeter that Venezuela has been fomenting - in order to contain the subversion and prevent the further planned violence emanating from Caracas.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Center: Hasten Chavez regime change in Venezuela
In a paper entitled Did the Bush Administration Compromise U.S. Security for Japanese Trade Talks Atmospherics?
This paper called on the Bush Administration to jettison immediately its arms-length policy toward Israel a recommendation made all the more imperative with the prospect of more generalized hostilities in the Middle East.
In a stinging, point-by-point indictment of the regime of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez, the paper calls on the Bush administration to repair its neglected and strained relationships across Latin America, and to work with neighboring democratic governments to ensure that the regime cannot consolidate itself or threaten its neighbors.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Center: Hasten Chavez regime change in Venezuela
Vannevar Bush wrote a great paper about how it could be done.
In a paper entitled Jackson-Vanik: Will Bush Reward Soviet Repression or Preserve Key Incentive for Reform, the Center illuminates the logic behind this landmark legislation and the compelling considerations that argue against waiving its provisions for the contemporary Soviet Union.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: This Is No Time To Waive Jackson-Vanik
Now it may also be the case that the administration was vetting the white paper for public release, in a manner similar to how the Bush administration handled NSA wiretapping, yet for some reason this administration decided to not to release the white paper.
FORBES: UPDATED: Six Key Points Regarding the DOJ Targeted Killing White Paper
The New York Times had not responded to Bush's allegations that the paper endangered national security as of Saturday afternoon.
In a paper released today, entitled Veto Shmeeto: Bush Should Sign the New Export Administration Act, the Center provides a qualified endorsement of this legislation, the Export Administration Act Amendments of 1990, and most of its revisions of current U.S. export control laws.
And in the year that followed, the paper's editorials routinely castigated George W. Bush for refusing to acknowledge it.
This paper, entitled Summit Watch: Tough Questions for President Bush, is designed to illuminate issues likely to feature prominently in the Bush and Gorbachev agendas.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Center Poses Tough Questions On Summit
Martin Feldstein, a pensions expert from Harvard University and a Bush adviser, argues (in a new paper written with Andrew Samwick of Dartmouth College) that diverting 2% of payroll taxes into private accounts would not mean a cut in overall retirement benefits.
ECONOMIST: Social Security reform: The battle of the boffins | The
Mr Bush is like a magnet beneath a piece of paper: as he moves, the iron filings silently form into new patterns.
This paper is an update to an earlier Center analysis entitled, The Bush Administration Rescue Plan for Poland: Shooting Ourselves in the Wallet? and an op. ed. by Roger W. Robinson, Jr. derived from that paper which appeared in the Wall Street Journal on 19 April 1989.
In a paper entitled, Resisting A "Munich in Our Time": Why President Bush Must Reject the New Central American "Peace" Plan, the Center notes a striking historical parallel: The Tela accord is unsettlingly reminiscent of the agreement fifty years ago that abandoned a free people to totalitarian aggression and postponed, rather than prevented, the outbreak of war.
CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: Avoiding A "Munich In Our Time" In Central America
In fact, what was most in evidence were the numerous ways in which Soviet policy sharply diverged from that of the United States and the lengths to which President Bush was prepared to go to compromise long-standing American interests to paper over such differences.
In fact, what was most in evidence were the numerous ways in which Soviet policy sharply diverged from that of the United States -- and the lengths to which President Bush was prepared to go to compromise long-standing American interests to paper over such differences.
The Bush administration, as the Center for Security Policy notes in a new paper, is right to resist calls to negotiate with the Stalinist regime and to prop it up with aid.
Brownback's office, the paper never had any criticism of the same bill when he submitted it during president George W. Bush's tenure in office.
应用推荐